Connect with us

Regulation

Dentro il tentativo inarrestabile di Caitlin Long di battere la Fed sul crypto banking – DL News

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Dentro il tentativo inarrestabile di Caitlin Long di battere la Fed sul crypto banking – DL News
  • L’ex dirigente di Wall Street Caitlin Long afferma che la Fed sta bloccando l’approvazione delle criptobanche.
  • La Federal Reserve di Kansas City era pronta ad approvare la richiesta di Custodia, ma Washington ha opposto il veto, ha detto Long a DL News.
  • La lotta per il crypto banking arriva mentre questa classe di asset sta diventando mainstream.

Nel Wyoming, la terra natale di Caitlin Long, i rancher hanno un detto: spara allo stallone per disperdere la mandria.

In altre parole, eliminare l’animale più forte per controllare quelli più deboli.

Si tratta della stessa strategia che Long sostiene che i regolatori abbiano impiegato contro Custodia, la criptobanca da lei fondata quattro anni fa a Cheyenne, nel Wyoming.

Long afferma che i funzionari bancari federali gli hanno negato servizi essenziali come parte di un’ampia repressione delle attività di criptovaluta in seguito al crollo di FTX, l’exchange di criptovalute in bancarotta un tempo guidato da un truffatore condannato Sam Bankman-Fritto.

“Hanno mandato un messaggio al resto dell’industria criticando il miglior attore”, ha detto il CEO di Custodia Notizie DL in una videochiamata dal Wyoming.

Come ottenere un conto bancario

Long, ex dirigente senior di Morgan Stanley e portavoce di spicco del settore delle criptovalute, non ha esitazioni nel promuovere Custodia.

Custodia è stata progettata per risolvere un problema fondamentale nel settore delle risorse digitali: come ottenere servizi bancari.

Anche prima che FTX confermasse i peggiori sospetti di molti enti di regolamentazione sulle criptovalute, le startup del settore avevano difficoltà ad aprire conti bancari.

Unisciti alla community per ricevere le nostre ultime storie e aggiornamenti

Custodia ha sollevato 51 milioni di dollari da investitori, tra cui Coinbase Ventures, Binance.US e Susquehanna Private Equity.

Offre servizi bancari in dollari, conti del mercato monetario e custodia di Bitcoin ai clienti di 32 stati degli Stati Uniti.

Tuttavia, Long ha trascorso la maggior parte degli ultimi due anni a combattere in tribunale contro la Federal Reserve di Kansas City per ottenere un conto bancario, un servizio che le banche tradizionali danno per scontato.

All’inizio di quest’anno, Custodia ha perso il primo round della sua causa quando un giudice si è schierato dalla parte della Fed.

Long, personalità effervescente nel panorama delle criptovalute e spesso ospite di conferenze di settore, tra cui Bitcoin 2024 la scorsa settimana, ha presentato ricorso contro la sentenza.

“L’industria delle criptovalute odia le grandi banche, e per una buona ragione. C’è questa rabbia profonda.”

—Caitlin Lungo

Mentre l’appello procede lentamente verso l’approvazione, gli alleati si sono schierati al suo fianco.

Questo mese, due ex procuratori generali degli Stati Uniti, Don Verrilli e Paul Clement, hanno presentato argomentazioni alla corte d’appello del Colorado a sostegno di Custodia.

La sua battaglia legale è diventata più di una semplice lotta tra una piccola banca e la potente banca centrale: è anche un evento memorabile per un settore che cerca legittimità nel sistema finanziario tradizionale.

“L’industria delle criptovalute odia le grandi banche, e per una buona ragione”, ha detto Long. “C’è questa rabbia profonda”.

Alleati influenti

Ha l’orecchio non solo dei legislatori del suo stato e del suo governatore, Mark Gordon, ma anche del senatore Cinzia Lummisrepubblicano del Wyoming, e Patrick Toomey, ex senatore repubblicano della Pennsylvania, sostenitore delle criptovalute.

Verrilli, ex procuratore generale dell’amministrazione Obama, ha rappresentato Scala di grigi nel suo caso con la Securities and Exchange Commission degli Stati Uniti.

La vittoria dell’azienda ha portato all’approvazione degli ETF spot Bitcoin a gennaio.

La sua lettera alla corte chiarisce perché Long ha trovato il favore dei sostenitori delle criptovalute.

“Nonostante l’urgente necessità di servizi bancari da parte del settore delle attività digitali”, ha scritto, “gli enti di regolamentazione federali hanno avviato una campagna coordinata e concertata per de-bancarizzare il settore”.

Lunga storia

Al centro della crociata di Long c’è un’ironia: Bitcoin e simili potrebbero essere stati progettati per scavalcare le banche, ma a quanto pare gli utenti di criptovalute ne hanno effettivamente bisogno per funzionare nel sistema finanziario.

È difficile, se non impossibile, utilizzare Bitcoin per regolare le transazioni quotidiane.

I clienti delle aziende operanti nel settore delle criptovalute necessitano di punti di accesso e di uscita affidabili tra i loro asset digitali e quelli fiat.

Tuttavia, i creditori tradizionali e i loro regolatori sono preoccupati per le attività bancarie che operano nel settore delle criptovalute e per il possesso di asset crittografici.

Ecco perché nel 2020 Long ha abbandonato una brillante carriera a Wall Street ed è tornata nella sua città natale, il Wyoming, per dirigere Custodia.

Long, laureata in giurisprudenza ad Harvard, ha iniziato a lavorare presso la Salomon Brothers negli anni Novanta.

Il suo mercato obbligazionario è stato descritto nel libro di Michael Lewis “Liar’s Poker” e le sue aggressive tattiche senza prigionieri sul mercato l’hanno resa una leggenda a Wall Street.

In seguito ha ricoperto per un decennio ruoli di responsabilità presso Credit Suisse e ha continuato a dirigere il settore pensionistico di Morgan Stanley.

Nel 2013 ha scoperto Bitcoin, che fatto ricorso alla sua vena libertaria.

Tre anni dopo, iniziò a fare pressioni sul governo del Wyoming affinché approvasse leggi che avrebbero consentito alle aziende del settore delle criptovalute di prosperare lì.

I legislatori hanno previsto nuovi investimenti e posti di lavoro per uno Stato rurale dipendente dalle risorse naturali e hanno approvato una serie di leggi favorevoli alle criptovalute nel 2019.

Una di queste leggi ha creato un nuovo tipo di banca: la banca depositaria per scopi speciali, o SPDI, che si pronuncia “speedy”.

L’idea era che alle banche SPDI sarebbe stato consentito di salvaguardare asset fiat e criptovalute per conto dei clienti, un’attività nota come custodia.

Le banche SPDI accettano i depositi dei clienti, ma a differenza delle banche tradizionali non possono utilizzarli per erogare prestiti e le attività devono essere interamente garantite.

Custodia ha presentato domanda per ottenere uno statuto SPDI e gli è stato concesso nell’ottobre 2020.

Il giorno dopo, la banca centrale locale, la Federal Reserve di Kansas City, presentò domanda per l’apertura di un cosiddetto conto master.

Un conto master è un portale di accesso alla rete di pagamenti, compensazione e regolamento della banca centrale.

Applicazione complicata

Non avere un account master non è la soluzione ideale.

Per accedere ai servizi della Fed, Custodia deve ricorrere a un intermediario, il che è costoso.

Mentre Custodia attendeva di conoscere la sua richiesta, il Consiglio dei governatori della Fed ha emanato delle linee guida su quale tipo di istituto ha diritto a un conto master.

Le banche prive di assicurazione federale sui depositi, tra cui Custodia, saranno ora valutate in modo rigoroso per l’apertura di un conto master in base a queste nuove linee guida.

Per rafforzare la sua applicazione, Long ha fatto sì che Custodia richiedesse l’assicurazione sui depositi e fosse regolamentata in modo più rigoroso.

Tuttavia, un anno e mezzo dopo aver inoltrato la richiesta per il conto principale, la richiesta di Custodia alla Federal Reserve di Kansas City era ancora in sospeso.

Per questo motivo, nel giugno 2022, Custodia ha intentato causa contro la Fed, accusandola di temporeggiare.

Custodia ha sostenuto che la Fed è tenuta a concedere conti master a tutti gli istituti di deposito idonei.

E poi, nel novembre 2022, FTX è crollata con un fallimento da 11 miliardi di dollari.

I media erano pieni di storie sensazionali sulla sua temerarietà e, in ultima analisi, sulla frode di Bankman-Fried.

Per regolatori che erano già diffidenti nei confronti delle criptovalute, il crollo ha rafforzato il senso di rischio che queste istituzioni rappresentavano per i depositanti.

Il mio amico Jay Powell

I tre regolatori bancari statunitensi (la Fed, la Federal Deposit Insurance Commission e l’Office of the Comptroller of the Currency) hanno emanato una serie di risoluzioni a gennaio e febbraio 2023.

Tali risoluzioni mettevano in guardia le banche dal fare affari con le aziende operanti nel settore delle criptovalute.

E non sorprende che a fine gennaio la richiesta di Custodia per il conto principale e l’adesione alla Fed sia stata respinta.

La Fed ha affermato che Custodia aveva un piano aziendale non diversificato, basato sul successo di una nuova e volatile classe di attività, aveva controlli inadeguati sulla finanza illecita e il suo management era inesperto nella gestione dei rischi specifici delle banche.

Ho giocato fino in fondo

Long aveva “calcolato la situazione” e aveva capito che c’era la possibilità che ciò potesse accadere, ha detto, ma per lei è stato comunque uno shock enorme.

“Ci siamo avvicinati a questa situazione aspettandoci pienamente di avere un rapporto amichevole con la Fed, perché lo stato del Wyoming aveva un rapporto amichevole con la Fed”, ha affermato Long.

Custodia ha motivo di sperare.

Uno dei giudici della corte d’appello, Robert Bacharach, ha affermato in un parere su un caso diverso che le banche statali hanno il diritto di aprire conti master.

Questa era solo l’opinione di un giudice. Ma è comunque un buon segno.

“Non è un precedente vincolante, ma non è neanche un precedente nullo”, ha affermato Long.

Organizzazione conservatrice

Long si vede in competizione con un establishment conservatore di banchieri e autorità di regolamentazione, che crea un ambiente difficile per gli sfidanti, che siano portatori di nuove tecnologie o appartenenti a minoranze.

“È davvero sorprendente quante poche banche negli Stati Uniti siano di proprietà di persone diverse da uomini bianchi”, ha affermato Long.

Meno dell’1% delle circa 4.600 banche assicurate a livello federale sono di proprietà di neri, secondo i dati FDIC.

Delle piccole banche americane, 16 sono di proprietà di donne, secondo i dati dell’OCC.

“È letteralmente un club e non siamo invitati”, ha detto.

“È davvero sorprendente quante poche banche negli Stati Uniti siano di proprietà di persone diverse da uomini bianchi”.

— Caitlin Long, Custodia

È significativo che a due banche siano stati concessi conti master, Numisma e Reserve Trust, gestiti da ex funzionari della Fed, ha affermato.

È anche significativo, ha detto, che il governatore della Fed Jerome Powell abbia concesso a Bankman-Fried un’ora del suo tempo, all’inizio del 2022, Il New York Times segnalato.

Long non è mai comparso nel diario di Powell.

“SBF ha ottenuto tutto questo accesso quando qualcuno che sapeva realmente cosa stava facendo e che avrebbe potuto essere in grado di aiutare la Fed è stato proverbialmente colpito da loro”, ha detto Long.

“Vergogna al governo. Vergogna”, disse, con la frustrazione che le crepitava nella voce.

La Fed non ha risposto alla richiesta di commento.

Paralizzato

Mentre Custodia combatte la Fed, deve anche mandare avanti i propri affari.

Senza un conto principale, deve accedere ai pagamenti della Fed tramite altre banche.

Alcune di queste banche hanno ritirato i loro servizi da Custodia, sotto la pressione degli enti regolatori, Long sostiene.

“Il fatto che siamo stati in grado di gestire un’attività bancaria è una testimonianza del desiderio di numerosi dirigenti del settore bancario di adottare nuove tecnologie e un riconoscimento che le criptovalute non scompariranno”, ha affermato Long.

“Sono disposti a correre il rischio di collaborare con qualcuno come noi, che ha standard di livello bancario, e ad andare avanti”.

Tuttavia, la Custodia “sta operando con entrambe le mani legate dietro la schiena”, ha affermato Long.

“Siamo stati paralizzati da ciò che la Fed ci ha fatto… Non saremo mai in grado di recuperare ciò che ci è costato”.

Joanna Wright si occupa di politica e regolamentazione per DL News. Contattatela a joanna@dlnews.com

Source

We are the editorial team of Chain Feed Staff, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Chain Feed Staff, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed significantly to its robust economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a favorite destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current cryptocurrency regulatory framework support such aspirations?

Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can push the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency scene. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia: An Overview

Slovenia is known for its pro-innovation stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

Regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency supervise cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?

This year, there have been several noteworthy developments in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024: Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain sovereign digital bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024: NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the legal framework for cryptocurrency taxation in Slovenia

Slovenia’s cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for both individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Tax Administration, tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

  • Individuals: Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from trading or market fluctuations are exempt from taxation.
  • Society: Capital gains from cryptocurrency activities are subject to a corporate income tax of 19%. Value added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies only. Tokens issued during ICOs must comply with standard accounting rules and the Corporate Tax Act.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Should Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but the income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both natural persons and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

  • 2013:The Slovenian Tax Administration has issued guidelines according to which income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
  • 2017:The Slovenian Tax Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, based on factors such as the trader’s status and the type of transaction.
  • 2023The EU has adopted the Markets in Cryptocurrencies Regulation (MiCA), which establishes a uniform regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Final note

Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency industry is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrency. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting user rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continuously improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Read also: Cryptocurrency Regulation in Hong Kong 2024

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

Photo by The Dhage of Shubham ON Disinfect

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been greater.

Vice President Kamala Harris is now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, presenting a unique opportunity for a clean slate. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gambling platforms like these online casinos in the uk. According to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms have advantages such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increased adoption could push the cryptocurrency market forward.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, which is a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has hindered innovation, as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A cohesive and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to unlock the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively embracing the cryptocurrency industry with clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies opting to set up in more hospitable environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change this narrative and clean up the future. cryptocurrency regulation. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to fostering a safe and innovative environment. Key principles guiding this regulation include clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity, while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are many and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and traditional users, spurring growth and adoption. This, in turn, can position countries like the United States as global leaders in financial technology and innovation. Strong protections will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, boosting economic activity.

A thriving cryptocurrency industry can significantly contribute to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many companies such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, proving that clear guidelines can unlock new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can alleviate fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the cryptocurrency industry to thrive, driving progress and prosperity.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News
  • The UK Law Commission has developed a bill that will address a situation of legal uncertainty.
  • The commission’s goal is to ensure that cryptocurrencies are legally treated as personal property.

UK law is not entirely clear whether cryptocurrencies can be considered personal property.

This is according to the UK Law Commission, which argues that while most investors assume that when they buy cryptocurrencies, they are “acquiring property rights in the same way as buying, say, a watch or a laptop.”

“As the law currently stands, this is not necessarily the case,” the respected legal body said in a new report on Tuesday.

The report was accompanied by a solution: a new bill to consolidate the legal status of digital assets as personal property.

This could be huge for the estimated 4.7 million Britons valued hold cryptocurrencies.

“This will allow the courts to determine a range of issues,” the report says.

If passed, the law would help clarify how cryptocurrencies are treated in cases of bankruptcy, estate planning or theft.

Flexible law

The commission is an independent body responsible for reviewing UK law. It began investigating whether English and Welsh property laws apply to digital assets in 2020.

Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates

At the time, then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak expressed ambitions to transform the UK into a cryptocurrency hub as Britons invested more.

In 2023, the commission decided that, in most cases, the legislation of England and Wales is sufficiently flexible to regulate cryptocurrencies.

This means that any asset, from Bitcoin to non-fungible tokens and some types of digital contracts, can be considered personal property, without Parliament having to write extensive new laws.

There was one small area of ​​uncertainty, however: it was unclear whether cryptocurrencies fell within the two categories of personal property recognised under UK law.

These two categories are made up of tangible assets (cars, laptops, bags) and intangible assets (contracts, stocks, and debt).

The bill that will now go to Parliament to be converted into law aims to remedy this situation.

Without that clarification, courts may try to lump cryptocurrencies together with intangible assets, said Adam Sanitt, head of litigation, knowledge, innovation and corporate support EMEA at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. DL News in March.

This is problematic because intangible assets are creations of the legal system, while cryptocurrencies are not.

“How the law treats digital assets, what rights you have over them, how you own them, how you transfer them to other people—that treatment is different, because digital assets don’t exist by virtue of the legal system, but independently of it,” Sanitt said.

The money in your bank account, for example, is a legal creation. The government could pass a law to cancel it.

However, if the UK passed a law banning Bitcoin, Bitcoin would not cease to exist.

Sanitt said: “That’s why digital assets are so important: neither the government nor the legal system can take them away from you.”

Contact the author at joanna@dlnews.com.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

The cryptocurrency industry has performed remarkably well since its inception, but now faces a critical hurdle that requires careful consideration and regulatory expertise to overcome. Despite the industry’s rapid growth and rate of global adoption, the gap between the industry and global regulation is only widening as new innovations break through into the public domain.

Although efforts are being made on both sides, regulators’ lack of familiarity with cryptocurrencies and the industry’s lack of regulatory expertise are hindering innovation in the sector. To address this issue, traditional financial institutions (TradFi) such as MultiBank Group have started venturing into the cryptocurrency sector.

The regulatory gap

Over the past decade, the cryptocurrency industry has grown dramatically as tech entrepreneurs and forward-thinking thinkers have founded a plethora of crypto platforms and protocols to push the boundaries of the space. The problem faced by these newcomers, who are often unfamiliar with the hurdles posed by financial regulators, can quickly overwhelm and stall operations.

On the other hand, regulators more attuned to TradFi systems may be equally stifled by the complexities of decentralization and blockchain technology. The unfamiliarity experienced by both innovators and regulators creates a stark regulatory divide between both sides, leading to misunderstandings and potential conflicts.

To overcome this lack of communication, a bridge must be built to bridge the gap, ensuring future stability for the cryptocurrency industry and clearer legislation from regulators.

Efforts to bridge the gap between industry

The gap between the cryptocurrency industry and regulators is slowly narrowing as efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies and Web3 space activities are gaining momentum. Specific regulatory actions are taking place in many countries, aimed at providing greater oversight of cryptocurrency transactions, cryptocurrency exchanges, and initial coin offerings (ICOs).

Despite being a positive step in the right direction, these new regulations can differ significantly between jurisdictions around the world. This fragmentation results in a regulatory environment filled with obstacles, bottlenecks, and varying requirements and prohibitions. As cryptocurrency companies and TradFi institutions attempt to navigate the minefield, the regulatory maze becomes increasingly convoluted.

TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group are working to solve this problem, as one of the largest financial derivatives institutions in the world with over 12 licenses across all continents. Founded in 2005, the Group has an impeccable and trustworthy reputation globally, extensive expertise in financial regulation and has now ventured into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io.

MultiBank.io: TradFi Excellence in the Crypto Space

Expanding into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io has enabled MultiBank Group to provide regulatory clarity and trust to the digital asset industry. With a substantial daily trading volume of $12.1 billion, the timely decision to enter the cryptocurrency space has the potential to set regulatory precedents and standards for years to come.

By helping to develop sensible and well-considered regulations, MultiBank.io’s established reputation allows the company to communicate effectively and clearly with regulators. Unlike others in the industry without regulatory expertise, MultiBank.io facilitates the Group’s commitment to rigorous regulatory standards, the scope of oversight and establishes the necessary transparency.

The company’s approach ensures that regulatory licenses are pre-acquired, compliance is met globally without jurisdictional barriers, and transactions remain secure at all times. By helping to create robust regulations that are both clear and innovation-friendly, MultiBank Group looks forward to standardizing the entire cryptocurrency industry for other potential innovators.

One of the biggest challenges in establishing a clearly constructed bridge between regulators and the cryptocurrency industry is effective communication. By leveraging its institutional background TradFi and acting as an intermediary with regulators, MultiBank Group is able to translate the needs of the industry to those who shape it.

This quality of mediation is essential to ensure that regulation helps develop essential technological advances rather than hinders their establishment and growth. Through the lens of TradFi when looking at the complexity of the cryptocurrency industry, MultiBank Group is able to deconstruct unfamiliar crypto arguments for regulation and create a safer and more secure space.

Where TradFi and Crypto Meet

Regulations are crucial for traders, investors, and everyday users of crypto platforms and their safety when participating in crypto markets. While strict regulations are necessary for stable market integrity, innovation should still be considered, something MultiBank Group considers a priority.

Where TradFi and cryptocurrencies converge, the Group is there to provide a balanced approach to ensure promotion for both the cryptocurrency industry and regulators seeking to protect both retail and institutional investors. This balance is critical to maintaining a thriving space where cryptocurrency innovation can thrive without compromising the security of user funds or data.

As more TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group enter the cryptocurrency space with ever-expanding expertise in regulatory understanding, the future of the industry is increasingly encouraged. The financial freedoms of the cryptocurrency space coupled with regulatory oversight for financial security will be the guiding lights for the future success of the entire cryptocurrency industry.

No spam, no lies, just insights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 CHAINFEED.INFO. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.