Connect with us

Regulation

Burattini politici o esagerazione normativa? L’indipendenza della SEC sotto i riflettori

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Burattini politici o esagerazione normativa?  L'indipendenza della SEC sotto i riflettori

La SEC ha perso la sua indipendenza, diventando un burattino della politica governativa piuttosto che un giusto regolatore nel settore delle criptovalute? Intervengono gli esperti.

Ultimamente, la Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) è stata sotto i riflettori, e non per le migliori ragioni.

Il presidente Joe Biden di recente posto il veto un disegno di legge mirato a ribaltamento un bollettino della SEC che stabilisce standard contabili specifici per le aziende che gestiscono criptovalute.

Il disegno di legge, se approvato, avrebbe abrogato le linee guida contabili della SEC sulla criptovaluta, note come SAB 121. Queste linee guida richiedono che le istituzioni che detengono criptovalute le registrino come passività nei loro bilanci.

Nella sua lettera di veto datata 31 maggio, Biden ha dichiarato: “La mia amministrazione non sosterrà misure che mettono a repentaglio il benessere dei consumatori e degli investitori.

Sono necessari guardrail adeguati che proteggano i consumatori e gli investitori per sfruttare i potenziali vantaggi e le opportunità dell’innovazione delle criptovalute”.

All’inizio del mese, la Camera e il Senato avevano entrambi votato a favore dell’abrogazione del SAB 121. passato con un voto di 228-182, sostenuto principalmente dai repubblicani ma anche da 21 democratici.

Il Senato ha seguito l’esempio con un voto di 60-38, compreso il sostegno di importanti democratici come il leader della maggioranza al Senato Chuck Schumer.

Tuttavia, revocare il veto presidenziale è un compito arduo, poiché richiede una maggioranza di due terzi in entrambe le Camere, cosa che sembra improbabile nell’attuale clima politico.

I critici sostengono che ciò complica il coinvolgimento delle istituzioni finanziarie con le società crittografiche, rendendo loro più difficile innovare e integrare le criptovalute nella finanza tradizionale.

La Blockchain Association ha twittato il proprio malcontento, affermando di essere “delusa dal fatto che l’amministrazione abbia scelto di annullare le maggioranze bipartisan in entrambe le Camere del Congresso che hanno riconosciuto il danno creato da SAB 121”.

Cody Carbone della Camera Digitale ha definito il veto “uno schiaffo in faccia all’innovazione e alla libertà finanziaria”.

Sheila Warren del Crypto Council ha riassunto: “Delusa ma non sorpresa dal veto di SAB121 CRA. Come dico spesso, il silenzio è d’oro perché alcune posizioni, una volta dichiarate pubblicamente, finiscono per essere difficili da ritirare”.

Quindi, dove va a finire la SEC? La sua eredità e autorità sembrano poggiare su un terreno instabile. Vediamo se la SEC ha davvero perso l’equilibrio.

Perdite consecutive per la SEC

La SEC statunitense ha attraversato un periodo difficile ultimamente e la comunità crittografica ne ha preso nota.

Il caso più notevole è il parziale vittoria per Ondulazione (XRP) nel luglio 2023, quando il tribunale distrettuale degli Stati Uniti per il distretto meridionale di New York si è pronunciato sulla questione se il token digitale XRP di Ripple sia un titolo.

La corte ha deciso che gli XRP venduti tramite Programmatic Sales non si qualificavano come contratti di investimento, il che significa che non erano titoli.

Questa è stata una vittoria cruciale per Ripple e una battuta d’arresto per la SEC, che è stata irremovibile nel regolamentare il settore delle criptovalute come se si trattasse di titoli tradizionali.

Per dirla in breve, le vendite di XRP attraverso gli scambi, dove acquirenti e venditori non si conoscono, sono state considerate non titoli. La corte ha ritenuto che queste transazioni non soddisfacessero il terzo polo del test di Howey, che esamina se esiste un’aspettativa di profitto basata sugli sforzi degli altri.

Sono state invece considerate titoli le vendite dirette agli investitori istituzionali. Questa sentenza mista ha dimostrato che, sebbene la portata normativa della SEC esista, non è assoluta.

Passando a un altro colpo critico, nell’agosto 2023, la SEC ha dovuto affrontare la sconfitta nella causa contro Grayscale Investments.

La Corte d’Appello degli Stati Uniti per il circuito DC ha stabilito che la SEC ha agito “arbitrario e capriccioso” negando la richiesta di Grayscale di convertire il suo Bitcoin Trust in un exchange-traded fund (ETF) Bitcoin spot.

La corte ha sottolineato che la SEC aveva precedentemente approvato gli ETF sui futures Bitcoin, che operano con meccanismi di sorveglianza del mercato simili a quelli spot proposti ETF su Bitcoin.

Questa incoerenza ha suggerito la logica imperfetta della SEC ed è stata una vittoria sostanziale per Grayscale e l’intero settore delle criptovalute, mettendo in discussione la posizione normativa della SEC.

La posizione della SEC su Ethereum (ET) è stato anche una montagna russa. Nel maggio 2024, la SEC ha compiuto un passo sorprendente approvando applicazioni per quotare e negoziare ETF spot su Ethereum.

Questo è stato un grosso problema perché fino ad allora solo gli ETF sui futures di Ethereum avevano avuto il via libera. Approvando gli ETF spot sull’Ethereum, la SEC ha indirettamente riconosciuto l’Ethereum più come una merce che come un titolo.

Questa classificazione potrebbe limitare il potere normativo della SEC su Ethereum e potenzialmente su altri asset crittografici, spostando maggiori responsabilità normative alla Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).

La recente sconfitta della SEC nel caso contro Digital Licensing Inc., nota anche come Debt Box, si aggiunge alla serie di battute d’arresto.

Solo pochi giorni fa, un giudice federale ha ordinato alla SEC di pagare circa 1,8 milioni di dollari in spese legali dopo aver archiviato il caso senza pregiudizi, il che significa che potrebbe potenzialmente essere riaperto.

La SEC aveva accusato Debt Box di aver frodato gli investitori per almeno 49 milioni di dollari. Tuttavia, il caso è stato funestato da problemi, tra cui false dichiarazioni e false dichiarazioni, che hanno portato alle dimissioni di due avvocati della SEC.

Il giudice ha criticato il comportamento della SEC, in particolare per quanto riguarda l’ordinanza restrittiva temporanea e il congelamento dei beni. Debt Box ha celebrato la sentenza come un passo verso la giustizia e la trasparenza.

La rissa in corso si intensifica

La SEC è stata criticata per la sua pesante regolamentazione del settore delle criptovalute, e i recenti sviluppi non hanno fatto altro che intensificare il controllo.

Innanzitutto, nel giugno 2023, la SEC iniziato una causa contro Coinbase, sostenendo che non si è mai registrata come broker, borsa valori nazionale o agenzia di compensazione, eludendo così i requisiti di divulgazione.

Coinbase ha sostenuto che l’approccio applicativo della SEC è progettato per soffocare il settore delle risorse digitali.

In un recente archiviazioneCoinbase ha affermato che la SEC non è interessata a creare linee guida chiare ed eque per il settore ma mira piuttosto a “soffocarlo”.

Coinbase ha sottolineato che anche il commissario della SEC Hester Pierce, noto sostenitore delle criptovalute, ha criticato l’agenzia per la sua mancanza di trasparenza e per aver ostacolato l’innovazione.

In secondo luogo, anche le azioni della SEC contro le entità legate a Ethereum hanno sollevato perplessità. Nonostante la SEC abbia approvato gli ETF spot su Ethereum, segnalando lo status di ETH come merce, l’agenzia continua a prendere di mira i principali attori dell’ecosistema Ethereum.

Uniswap (UNI), ad esempio, ha ricevuto una notifica Wells dalla SEC, che indicava potenziali violazioni della legge sui titoli. Uniswap e altre società basate su Ethereum litigare che la classificazione dei token come titoli da parte della SEC è obsoleta e incoerente.

Poi c’è Consensys, fondata dal co-fondatore di Ethereum Joe Lubin, che ha adottato un approccio più proattivo fare causa la SEC.

La SEC aveva emesso un avviso di Wells a Consensys, concentrandosi sul suo portafoglio MetaMask e sulle sue caratteristiche di staking. Questa causa è un tentativo di respingere ciò che Consensys vede come “sequestro illegale di autorità da parte della SEC.

Intervengono la comunità e gli esperti

Le recenti azioni della SEC hanno scatenato un’ampia gamma di discussioni sui social media, con molti che si chiedono se l’agenzia sia diventata una marionetta del governo.

Su Twitter il sentimento è di frustrazione e incredulità. Gli utenti esprimono apertamente la loro insoddisfazione per le decisioni della SEC, in particolare per il veto del presidente Biden su un disegno di legge volto ad abrogare il SAB 121.

SU Redditil discorso è ancora più intenso, con gli utenti che esprimono opinioni forti sulle azioni della SEC.

I sentimenti degli utenti su Reddit riflettono una profonda sfiducia nei confronti dell’agenzia e suggeriscono che motivazioni politiche potrebbero guidare le sue decisioni. Ad esempio, alcuni utenti ipotizzano che la SEC agisca sotto l’influenza di legislatori che non comprendono appieno il mercato delle criptovalute.

Un utente ha sottolineato l’incoerenza nelle decisioni della SEC, chiedendosi perché l’agenzia abbia approvato un ETF sui futures per quello che considera un titolo non registrato.

Un altro utente ha espresso scetticismo riguardo alle motivazioni della SEC, suggerendo che l’agenzia potrebbe cercare di cronometrare il mercato per smorzare le tendenze rialziste nel settore delle criptovalute.

I commenti riflettono anche un senso di frustrazione per l’incapacità percepita dalla SEC di fornire linee guida chiare, portando a incertezze legali e sfide per le aziende cripto.

L’esperto finanziario Alexey Krichevsky, autore del canale Telegram “Economism”, commenta esclusivamente a crypto.news, ha fatto eco a questi sentimenti. Egli suggerì:

La SEC ha perso la sua indipendenza proprio con la presidenza di Biden. Prima di allora, la commissione aveva molta più influenza non solo sul mercato delle criptovalute ma anche su altri asset. Ora, è chiaro che l’amministrazione Biden sta flirtando attivamente con gli utenti di criptovalute negli Stati Uniti, cercando di limitare i loro asset crittografici e facendo pressioni per il dollaro digitale.

Alexey Krichevskij

Krichevskij ha sostenuto che le azioni dell’amministrazione, inclusa la rapida approvazione degli ETF su Bitcoin ed Ethereum, indicano una strategia politica. Ha anche contestato il ritmo rapido con cui la SEC ha approvato gli ETF sull’Ethereum, lasciando intendere che tali decisioni potrebbero essere motivate politicamente piuttosto che basate su un’approfondita revisione normativa. Ha menzionato:

La SEC ha incaricato le società di investimento di correggere diversi difetti in un paio di giorni per approvare il lancio il più rapidamente possibile. A meno che questo non sia uno strumento nella lotta politica contro Trump, che è apertamente a favore delle criptovalute, non ci sono altre opzioni: l’umore delle autorità non potrebbe cambiare così rapidamente.

Alexey Krichevskij

Sebbene la frustrazione e il sospetto siano palpabili, è essenziale considerare la prospettiva della SEC e il suo mandato di proteggere gli investitori. L’agenzia ha sostenuto che i suoi regolamenti sono progettati per salvaguardare il sistema finanziario e garantire la trasparenza.

Nel complesso, sono necessarie linee guida chiare, giuste e coerenti per promuovere l’innovazione garantendo al tempo stesso la tutela degli investitori. La percezione della SEC come strumento politico ne mina la credibilità e l’efficacia e dovrebbe cambiare.

Divulgazione: i punti di vista e le opinioni qui espressi appartengono esclusivamente all’autore e non rappresentano i punti di vista e le opinioni dell’editoriale di crypto.news.



Source

We are the editorial team of Chain Feed Staff, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Chain Feed Staff, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed significantly to its robust economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a favorite destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current cryptocurrency regulatory framework support such aspirations?

Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can push the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency scene. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia: An Overview

Slovenia is known for its pro-innovation stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

Regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency supervise cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?

This year, there have been several noteworthy developments in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024: Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain sovereign digital bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024: NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the legal framework for cryptocurrency taxation in Slovenia

Slovenia’s cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for both individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Tax Administration, tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

  • Individuals: Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from trading or market fluctuations are exempt from taxation.
  • Society: Capital gains from cryptocurrency activities are subject to a corporate income tax of 19%. Value added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies only. Tokens issued during ICOs must comply with standard accounting rules and the Corporate Tax Act.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Should Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but the income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both natural persons and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

  • 2013:The Slovenian Tax Administration has issued guidelines according to which income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
  • 2017:The Slovenian Tax Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, based on factors such as the trader’s status and the type of transaction.
  • 2023The EU has adopted the Markets in Cryptocurrencies Regulation (MiCA), which establishes a uniform regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Final note

Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency industry is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrency. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting user rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continuously improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Read also: Cryptocurrency Regulation in Hong Kong 2024

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

Photo by The Dhage of Shubham ON Disinfect

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been greater.

Vice President Kamala Harris is now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, presenting a unique opportunity for a clean slate. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gambling platforms like these online casinos in the uk. According to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms have advantages such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increased adoption could push the cryptocurrency market forward.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, which is a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has hindered innovation, as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A cohesive and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to unlock the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively embracing the cryptocurrency industry with clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies opting to set up in more hospitable environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change this narrative and clean up the future. cryptocurrency regulation. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to fostering a safe and innovative environment. Key principles guiding this regulation include clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity, while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are many and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and traditional users, spurring growth and adoption. This, in turn, can position countries like the United States as global leaders in financial technology and innovation. Strong protections will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, boosting economic activity.

A thriving cryptocurrency industry can significantly contribute to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many companies such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, proving that clear guidelines can unlock new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can alleviate fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the cryptocurrency industry to thrive, driving progress and prosperity.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News
  • The UK Law Commission has developed a bill that will address a situation of legal uncertainty.
  • The commission’s goal is to ensure that cryptocurrencies are legally treated as personal property.

UK law is not entirely clear whether cryptocurrencies can be considered personal property.

This is according to the UK Law Commission, which argues that while most investors assume that when they buy cryptocurrencies, they are “acquiring property rights in the same way as buying, say, a watch or a laptop.”

“As the law currently stands, this is not necessarily the case,” the respected legal body said in a new report on Tuesday.

The report was accompanied by a solution: a new bill to consolidate the legal status of digital assets as personal property.

This could be huge for the estimated 4.7 million Britons valued hold cryptocurrencies.

“This will allow the courts to determine a range of issues,” the report says.

If passed, the law would help clarify how cryptocurrencies are treated in cases of bankruptcy, estate planning or theft.

Flexible law

The commission is an independent body responsible for reviewing UK law. It began investigating whether English and Welsh property laws apply to digital assets in 2020.

Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates

At the time, then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak expressed ambitions to transform the UK into a cryptocurrency hub as Britons invested more.

In 2023, the commission decided that, in most cases, the legislation of England and Wales is sufficiently flexible to regulate cryptocurrencies.

This means that any asset, from Bitcoin to non-fungible tokens and some types of digital contracts, can be considered personal property, without Parliament having to write extensive new laws.

There was one small area of ​​uncertainty, however: it was unclear whether cryptocurrencies fell within the two categories of personal property recognised under UK law.

These two categories are made up of tangible assets (cars, laptops, bags) and intangible assets (contracts, stocks, and debt).

The bill that will now go to Parliament to be converted into law aims to remedy this situation.

Without that clarification, courts may try to lump cryptocurrencies together with intangible assets, said Adam Sanitt, head of litigation, knowledge, innovation and corporate support EMEA at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. DL News in March.

This is problematic because intangible assets are creations of the legal system, while cryptocurrencies are not.

“How the law treats digital assets, what rights you have over them, how you own them, how you transfer them to other people—that treatment is different, because digital assets don’t exist by virtue of the legal system, but independently of it,” Sanitt said.

The money in your bank account, for example, is a legal creation. The government could pass a law to cancel it.

However, if the UK passed a law banning Bitcoin, Bitcoin would not cease to exist.

Sanitt said: “That’s why digital assets are so important: neither the government nor the legal system can take them away from you.”

Contact the author at joanna@dlnews.com.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

The cryptocurrency industry has performed remarkably well since its inception, but now faces a critical hurdle that requires careful consideration and regulatory expertise to overcome. Despite the industry’s rapid growth and rate of global adoption, the gap between the industry and global regulation is only widening as new innovations break through into the public domain.

Although efforts are being made on both sides, regulators’ lack of familiarity with cryptocurrencies and the industry’s lack of regulatory expertise are hindering innovation in the sector. To address this issue, traditional financial institutions (TradFi) such as MultiBank Group have started venturing into the cryptocurrency sector.

The regulatory gap

Over the past decade, the cryptocurrency industry has grown dramatically as tech entrepreneurs and forward-thinking thinkers have founded a plethora of crypto platforms and protocols to push the boundaries of the space. The problem faced by these newcomers, who are often unfamiliar with the hurdles posed by financial regulators, can quickly overwhelm and stall operations.

On the other hand, regulators more attuned to TradFi systems may be equally stifled by the complexities of decentralization and blockchain technology. The unfamiliarity experienced by both innovators and regulators creates a stark regulatory divide between both sides, leading to misunderstandings and potential conflicts.

To overcome this lack of communication, a bridge must be built to bridge the gap, ensuring future stability for the cryptocurrency industry and clearer legislation from regulators.

Efforts to bridge the gap between industry

The gap between the cryptocurrency industry and regulators is slowly narrowing as efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies and Web3 space activities are gaining momentum. Specific regulatory actions are taking place in many countries, aimed at providing greater oversight of cryptocurrency transactions, cryptocurrency exchanges, and initial coin offerings (ICOs).

Despite being a positive step in the right direction, these new regulations can differ significantly between jurisdictions around the world. This fragmentation results in a regulatory environment filled with obstacles, bottlenecks, and varying requirements and prohibitions. As cryptocurrency companies and TradFi institutions attempt to navigate the minefield, the regulatory maze becomes increasingly convoluted.

TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group are working to solve this problem, as one of the largest financial derivatives institutions in the world with over 12 licenses across all continents. Founded in 2005, the Group has an impeccable and trustworthy reputation globally, extensive expertise in financial regulation and has now ventured into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io.

MultiBank.io: TradFi Excellence in the Crypto Space

Expanding into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io has enabled MultiBank Group to provide regulatory clarity and trust to the digital asset industry. With a substantial daily trading volume of $12.1 billion, the timely decision to enter the cryptocurrency space has the potential to set regulatory precedents and standards for years to come.

By helping to develop sensible and well-considered regulations, MultiBank.io’s established reputation allows the company to communicate effectively and clearly with regulators. Unlike others in the industry without regulatory expertise, MultiBank.io facilitates the Group’s commitment to rigorous regulatory standards, the scope of oversight and establishes the necessary transparency.

The company’s approach ensures that regulatory licenses are pre-acquired, compliance is met globally without jurisdictional barriers, and transactions remain secure at all times. By helping to create robust regulations that are both clear and innovation-friendly, MultiBank Group looks forward to standardizing the entire cryptocurrency industry for other potential innovators.

One of the biggest challenges in establishing a clearly constructed bridge between regulators and the cryptocurrency industry is effective communication. By leveraging its institutional background TradFi and acting as an intermediary with regulators, MultiBank Group is able to translate the needs of the industry to those who shape it.

This quality of mediation is essential to ensure that regulation helps develop essential technological advances rather than hinders their establishment and growth. Through the lens of TradFi when looking at the complexity of the cryptocurrency industry, MultiBank Group is able to deconstruct unfamiliar crypto arguments for regulation and create a safer and more secure space.

Where TradFi and Crypto Meet

Regulations are crucial for traders, investors, and everyday users of crypto platforms and their safety when participating in crypto markets. While strict regulations are necessary for stable market integrity, innovation should still be considered, something MultiBank Group considers a priority.

Where TradFi and cryptocurrencies converge, the Group is there to provide a balanced approach to ensure promotion for both the cryptocurrency industry and regulators seeking to protect both retail and institutional investors. This balance is critical to maintaining a thriving space where cryptocurrency innovation can thrive without compromising the security of user funds or data.

As more TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group enter the cryptocurrency space with ever-expanding expertise in regulatory understanding, the future of the industry is increasingly encouraged. The financial freedoms of the cryptocurrency space coupled with regulatory oversight for financial security will be the guiding lights for the future success of the entire cryptocurrency industry.

No spam, no lies, just insights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 CHAINFEED.INFO. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.