Connect with us

Regulation

JD Vance Likes Lina Khan and Crypto, Hates ‘Big Tech’

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

JD Vance Likes Lina Khan and Crypto, Hates 'Big Tech'

In February, about a hundred people gathered at Bloomberg’s Washington, D.C., office for a conference hosted by the startup incubator Y Combinator.

It was an event featuring some of the biggest names in the modern antitrust reform movement, including Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) and Federal Trade Commission Chairwoman Lina Khan. Both have been advocates for a revamp of what they see as an outdated vision of U.S. antitrust law that they believe has allowed the biggest tech companies to evade scrutiny, stifling the aspiring startups that Y Combinator has made its name investing in.

Speaking that day too was Senator J.D. Vance (R-OH), who former President Donald Trump just named as his choice for vice president on the Republican ticketVance’s ties to Silicon Valley date back to before Trump’s election in 2016, when he worked for billionaire venture capitalist Peter Thiel. He was at a small D.C. event earlier this year to share, perhaps surprisingly, the same message as Warren and Khan: Big Tech needs to be reined in.

“The fundamental question for me is: How do we build a competitive marketplace that is pro-innovation, pro-competition, that allows consumers to have fair choices and is not so obsessed with pricing power within the marketplace that it ignores all the other things that really matter?” Vance told the audience.

He went on to single out Khan, the Biden official whom many of his Republican colleagues have harshly criticized for her aggressive stance on blocking tech deals. “I consider Lina Khan to be one of the few people in the Biden administration who I think is actually doing a good job,” he said at the Y Combinator event, which was nicknamed RemedyFesta reference to antitrust measures such as the splitting of companies.

“I consider Lina Khan to be one of the few people in the Biden administration who I think is actually doing a good job.”

Like many powerful Republicans, Vance sees the crackdown on big tech as a way to loosen the control a handful of Bay Area companies have over how speech is distributed online. It’s an issue the right has taken up in both Congress and the Supreme Court as tech-driven content moderation policies on election misinformation increasingly conflict with what have become mainstream Republican talking points.

A few days before his appearance at RemedyFest, Vance said that “It’s time to dismantle Google” in response to a post on X that argued that Google News has increasingly cited left-wing sources in recent years.

“I think Google and Facebook have really distorted our political process,” Vance said at RemedyFest, which The Verge attended. “And I think a lot of my friends on the left would agree with me, but they might not agree with me on how to fix this.”

“It’s time to break up Google”

He said he feared that Google could display search results about Joe Biden’s competency to be president in a way that could unduly influence voters. “We have to stop the madness, and I think one way to do that is to stop the way these companies control the flow of information in our country.”

In a 2022 televised debate, Vance said he thought “the 2020 election was stolen from Trump,” an endorsement of the statement that predicted the January 6 riot and Trump’s subsequent ban on social media platforms like X and Facebook. Earlier that year, Vance called those arrested on January 6 “political prisoners” in a post about X.

Garrett Ventry, a political consultant who previously served as chief of staff to former Rep. Ken Buck (R-CO), told The Verge that Vance “is a welcome choice for anyone interested in curbing the monopolistic power of Big Tech.”

Ventry’s former boss had been a leading republican in the failed bipartisan effort to implement a new technological competition Before Buck has chosen to leave CongressLast year, Buck and Vance both drove a letter to the U.S. Trade Representative and the Secretary of Commerce, urging them not to block competition policies which were under active discussion in Congress for conversion into trade agreements.

Vance also spoke out in favor of a more relaxed approach to cryptocurrency regulation

At the same time, Vance has also spoken out in favor of a more relaxed approach to cryptocurrency regulation, a position that is apparently aligned with Trump and is also attracting hundreds of millions of dollars in PAC contributions from the likes of Marc Andreessen, Ben Horowitz, and Elon Musk. At RemedyFest, Vance criticized Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler for his approach to cryptocurrency that “seems to be almost the exact opposite of what it should be.”

“The question the SEC seems to be asking when they regulate cryptocurrencies is, ‘Is this a utility token?’” Vance said at the event. “And if it’s a utility token, then they seem to want to ban it. If it’s a non-utility token, they don’t seem to care.” Vance thinks utility tokens can be regulated but shouldn’t be eliminated altogether.

He worries about over-regulation of blockchain technology because he believes incumbent social media challengers like Meta will rely on it for features like identity verification. “If we don’t enable verification, then we’re going to make it really hard to challenge the incumbents in the space,” he said at RemedyFest.

It’s not yet clear how much influence Vance would have in a second Trump administration or how Trump’s views might conflict with those of his running mate. “Vice presidents don’t set policy, presidents do,” Barry Lynn, executive director of the Open Markets Institute, told The Verge in an emailed statement. “Bottom line, Trump’s policies would destroy the federal government as we’ve known it since the Interstate Commerce Act of 1887. And if you don’t have a functioning federal government, you can’t enforce antimonopoly law.”

Vance admitted at RemedyFest that he had not spoken specifically with Trump about antitrust policy, but said he thought the former president’s “instincts on these things are pretty good.”

JD Vance at the ultra-exclusive Sun Valley tech and media conference in 2017. Photo by Drew Angerer/Getty Images

Vance has long-standing ties to the tech industry. He worked as an investor for Thiel’s Mithril Capital and was catapulted to the attention of Silicon Valley elites in 2016 with the publication of Hillbilly Elegy, his bestselling memoir about growing up in Kentucky and Ohio. The book’s influence has become hard to miss in some tech circles after Trump became president.

Thiel famously played a key role in helping elect Trump in 2016. He later helped fund Vance’s successful 2022 Senate campaign. During that time, both Thiel and Vance invested in Rumble, a conservative YouTube competitor.

While Thiel distanced himself from Trump after Biden took office in 2020, Vance stepped up. Republican tech donors have been pushing for him to be Trump’s vice presidential pick for some time. Last month, he helped launch a fundraiser for Trump in San Francisco hosted by tech investors David Sacks and Chamath Palihapitiya of the All-In podcast.

Vance’s anti-Google and pro-crypto leanings are right in line with a certain corner of Silicon Valley, as is his sympathy for the pronatalist movementwhose obsession with declining birth rates is sometimes at odds with women’s bodily autonomy.

A tech executive who supports Biden and has met with Vance several times described him as “grounded” to The Verge. “He’s younger and he gets it.”

Regardless of the impact Vance might have on a potential second Trump term, there’s no denying that he would bring a strong vision to the White House for how to regulate the tech industry. In his RemedyFest speech earlier this year, Vance recalled the inception of U.S. antitrust law in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and said many of the same arguments advocates made back then apply to the modern era.

“There’s a recognition that concentrated private power could be just as dangerous as concentrated public power,” Vance said. “That recognition is so important to recovering on the right.”



Source

We are the editorial team of Chain Feed Staff, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Chain Feed Staff, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed significantly to its robust economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a favorite destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current cryptocurrency regulatory framework support such aspirations?

Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can push the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency scene. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia: An Overview

Slovenia is known for its pro-innovation stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

Regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency supervise cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?

This year, there have been several noteworthy developments in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024: Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain sovereign digital bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024: NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the legal framework for cryptocurrency taxation in Slovenia

Slovenia’s cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for both individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Tax Administration, tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

  • Individuals: Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from trading or market fluctuations are exempt from taxation.
  • Society: Capital gains from cryptocurrency activities are subject to a corporate income tax of 19%. Value added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies only. Tokens issued during ICOs must comply with standard accounting rules and the Corporate Tax Act.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Should Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but the income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both natural persons and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

  • 2013:The Slovenian Tax Administration has issued guidelines according to which income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
  • 2017:The Slovenian Tax Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, based on factors such as the trader’s status and the type of transaction.
  • 2023The EU has adopted the Markets in Cryptocurrencies Regulation (MiCA), which establishes a uniform regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Final note

Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency industry is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrency. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting user rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continuously improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Read also: Cryptocurrency Regulation in Hong Kong 2024

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

Photo by The Dhage of Shubham ON Disinfect

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been greater.

Vice President Kamala Harris is now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, presenting a unique opportunity for a clean slate. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gambling platforms like these online casinos in the uk. According to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms have advantages such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increased adoption could push the cryptocurrency market forward.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, which is a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has hindered innovation, as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A cohesive and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to unlock the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively embracing the cryptocurrency industry with clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies opting to set up in more hospitable environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change this narrative and clean up the future. cryptocurrency regulation. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to fostering a safe and innovative environment. Key principles guiding this regulation include clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity, while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are many and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and traditional users, spurring growth and adoption. This, in turn, can position countries like the United States as global leaders in financial technology and innovation. Strong protections will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, boosting economic activity.

A thriving cryptocurrency industry can significantly contribute to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many companies such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, proving that clear guidelines can unlock new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can alleviate fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the cryptocurrency industry to thrive, driving progress and prosperity.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News
  • The UK Law Commission has developed a bill that will address a situation of legal uncertainty.
  • The commission’s goal is to ensure that cryptocurrencies are legally treated as personal property.

UK law is not entirely clear whether cryptocurrencies can be considered personal property.

This is according to the UK Law Commission, which argues that while most investors assume that when they buy cryptocurrencies, they are “acquiring property rights in the same way as buying, say, a watch or a laptop.”

“As the law currently stands, this is not necessarily the case,” the respected legal body said in a new report on Tuesday.

The report was accompanied by a solution: a new bill to consolidate the legal status of digital assets as personal property.

This could be huge for the estimated 4.7 million Britons valued hold cryptocurrencies.

“This will allow the courts to determine a range of issues,” the report says.

If passed, the law would help clarify how cryptocurrencies are treated in cases of bankruptcy, estate planning or theft.

Flexible law

The commission is an independent body responsible for reviewing UK law. It began investigating whether English and Welsh property laws apply to digital assets in 2020.

Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates

At the time, then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak expressed ambitions to transform the UK into a cryptocurrency hub as Britons invested more.

In 2023, the commission decided that, in most cases, the legislation of England and Wales is sufficiently flexible to regulate cryptocurrencies.

This means that any asset, from Bitcoin to non-fungible tokens and some types of digital contracts, can be considered personal property, without Parliament having to write extensive new laws.

There was one small area of ​​uncertainty, however: it was unclear whether cryptocurrencies fell within the two categories of personal property recognised under UK law.

These two categories are made up of tangible assets (cars, laptops, bags) and intangible assets (contracts, stocks, and debt).

The bill that will now go to Parliament to be converted into law aims to remedy this situation.

Without that clarification, courts may try to lump cryptocurrencies together with intangible assets, said Adam Sanitt, head of litigation, knowledge, innovation and corporate support EMEA at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. DL News in March.

This is problematic because intangible assets are creations of the legal system, while cryptocurrencies are not.

“How the law treats digital assets, what rights you have over them, how you own them, how you transfer them to other people—that treatment is different, because digital assets don’t exist by virtue of the legal system, but independently of it,” Sanitt said.

The money in your bank account, for example, is a legal creation. The government could pass a law to cancel it.

However, if the UK passed a law banning Bitcoin, Bitcoin would not cease to exist.

Sanitt said: “That’s why digital assets are so important: neither the government nor the legal system can take them away from you.”

Contact the author at joanna@dlnews.com.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

The cryptocurrency industry has performed remarkably well since its inception, but now faces a critical hurdle that requires careful consideration and regulatory expertise to overcome. Despite the industry’s rapid growth and rate of global adoption, the gap between the industry and global regulation is only widening as new innovations break through into the public domain.

Although efforts are being made on both sides, regulators’ lack of familiarity with cryptocurrencies and the industry’s lack of regulatory expertise are hindering innovation in the sector. To address this issue, traditional financial institutions (TradFi) such as MultiBank Group have started venturing into the cryptocurrency sector.

The regulatory gap

Over the past decade, the cryptocurrency industry has grown dramatically as tech entrepreneurs and forward-thinking thinkers have founded a plethora of crypto platforms and protocols to push the boundaries of the space. The problem faced by these newcomers, who are often unfamiliar with the hurdles posed by financial regulators, can quickly overwhelm and stall operations.

On the other hand, regulators more attuned to TradFi systems may be equally stifled by the complexities of decentralization and blockchain technology. The unfamiliarity experienced by both innovators and regulators creates a stark regulatory divide between both sides, leading to misunderstandings and potential conflicts.

To overcome this lack of communication, a bridge must be built to bridge the gap, ensuring future stability for the cryptocurrency industry and clearer legislation from regulators.

Efforts to bridge the gap between industry

The gap between the cryptocurrency industry and regulators is slowly narrowing as efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies and Web3 space activities are gaining momentum. Specific regulatory actions are taking place in many countries, aimed at providing greater oversight of cryptocurrency transactions, cryptocurrency exchanges, and initial coin offerings (ICOs).

Despite being a positive step in the right direction, these new regulations can differ significantly between jurisdictions around the world. This fragmentation results in a regulatory environment filled with obstacles, bottlenecks, and varying requirements and prohibitions. As cryptocurrency companies and TradFi institutions attempt to navigate the minefield, the regulatory maze becomes increasingly convoluted.

TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group are working to solve this problem, as one of the largest financial derivatives institutions in the world with over 12 licenses across all continents. Founded in 2005, the Group has an impeccable and trustworthy reputation globally, extensive expertise in financial regulation and has now ventured into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io.

MultiBank.io: TradFi Excellence in the Crypto Space

Expanding into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io has enabled MultiBank Group to provide regulatory clarity and trust to the digital asset industry. With a substantial daily trading volume of $12.1 billion, the timely decision to enter the cryptocurrency space has the potential to set regulatory precedents and standards for years to come.

By helping to develop sensible and well-considered regulations, MultiBank.io’s established reputation allows the company to communicate effectively and clearly with regulators. Unlike others in the industry without regulatory expertise, MultiBank.io facilitates the Group’s commitment to rigorous regulatory standards, the scope of oversight and establishes the necessary transparency.

The company’s approach ensures that regulatory licenses are pre-acquired, compliance is met globally without jurisdictional barriers, and transactions remain secure at all times. By helping to create robust regulations that are both clear and innovation-friendly, MultiBank Group looks forward to standardizing the entire cryptocurrency industry for other potential innovators.

One of the biggest challenges in establishing a clearly constructed bridge between regulators and the cryptocurrency industry is effective communication. By leveraging its institutional background TradFi and acting as an intermediary with regulators, MultiBank Group is able to translate the needs of the industry to those who shape it.

This quality of mediation is essential to ensure that regulation helps develop essential technological advances rather than hinders their establishment and growth. Through the lens of TradFi when looking at the complexity of the cryptocurrency industry, MultiBank Group is able to deconstruct unfamiliar crypto arguments for regulation and create a safer and more secure space.

Where TradFi and Crypto Meet

Regulations are crucial for traders, investors, and everyday users of crypto platforms and their safety when participating in crypto markets. While strict regulations are necessary for stable market integrity, innovation should still be considered, something MultiBank Group considers a priority.

Where TradFi and cryptocurrencies converge, the Group is there to provide a balanced approach to ensure promotion for both the cryptocurrency industry and regulators seeking to protect both retail and institutional investors. This balance is critical to maintaining a thriving space where cryptocurrency innovation can thrive without compromising the security of user funds or data.

As more TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group enter the cryptocurrency space with ever-expanding expertise in regulatory understanding, the future of the industry is increasingly encouraged. The financial freedoms of the cryptocurrency space coupled with regulatory oversight for financial security will be the guiding lights for the future success of the entire cryptocurrency industry.

No spam, no lies, just insights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 CHAINFEED.INFO. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.