Connect with us

Regulation

A legal expert discusses how the US political climate could redefine crypto regulations

Avatar

Published

on

Legal expert discusses how US political climate could redefine crypto regulations

Crypto.news recently spoke with Bing Wang, Chief Legal Officer at BasedVC, who shared his perspectives on the political rise of cryptocurrencies and upcoming regulatory transformations.

As the 2024 US election approaches, the political landscape around cryptocurrencies is undergoing major changes.

Surprising alliances are forming in Congress, with crypto-friendly laws gaining bipartisan support. Key figures like Chuck Schumer and former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who have traditionally held divergent views, are now emerging as unexpected allies.

The Biden administration has begun to show a newfound openness with crypto policy, suggesting that skeptics like Senator Elizabeth Warren may soon find themselves isolated.

On the Republican side, former President Donald Trump has stepped up its support for the crypto community, pledging to protect digital asset traders and accepting donations for cryptocurrency campaigns.

It is quite clear that the role of cryptocurrencies is expected to be a crucial issue this year, something that could shape the future regulatory landscape for the emerging sector.

Wang believes this shift in political dynamics will accelerate the adoption and integration of cryptocurrencies in the United States

How significant do you think the role of cryptocurrencies will be in the 2024 US elections?

Cryptocurrencies have always been important in US politics. The famous case of Sam Bankman-Fried and FTX saw him funnel cryptocurrencies to candidates in the US midterm elections. However, the impact in the next elections in 2024 will be enormous. With pro-cryptocurrency legislation passing through Congress in the last 3 weeks, Democrats and Republicans are pushing to embrace cryptocurrencies even more. The elections will have cryptocurrencies on the agenda and having positive sentiment towards them will be a key talking point.

The Biden administration has shown a shift in its stance on cryptocurrencies, highlighted by the approval of spot Ether ETFs and dialogue with cryptocurrency industry experts. What impact might these changes have on the cryptocurrency industry, and do you think they will address the concerns of cryptocurrency enthusiasts who have criticized the administration’s previous policies?

The Biden administration’s sudden change in stance is a huge moment for cryptocurrencies. Some say this is an attempt to deceive the electorate, but that doesn’t matter, as it appears to address concerns the industry has long had. The House has passed a bill to repeal the Securities and Exchange Commission’s crypto guidance that has had the regulator in a negative grip on the market. If signed into law, the new bill will help overhaul the SEC and CFTC’s oversight of cryptocurrencies and create more streamlined guidance on cryptocurrency regulation. This is a huge win for the industry.

Considering the bipartisan support for cryptocurrency-related legislation, such as the Deploying American Blockchains Act and the FIT21 Act, what specific regulatory changes can the crypto community anticipate in the coming years?

Pro-crypto senators are banding together and an attempt is underway to revive previously moribund crypto bills. Biden’s campaign has begun discussing digital asset policy with Democratic allies, while Stabenow’s bill to overhaul how the SEC and CFTC share oversight of cryptocurrencies is back on the table. Legislation on stablecoins is also being negotiated in the Chamber. The next few years are expected to see a flurry of laws that attempt to give a clear path on the regulation of cryptocurrencies, something that most cryptocurrency companies have been aspiring to.

Do you think government engagement with cryptocurrency industry experts will help improve public understanding and awareness of cryptocurrency technologies?

Just as the Senate has sought to engage with social media companies like Facebook, TikTok and X (formerly Twitter), stakeholders need to meet in roundtables to discuss pressing issues. Avoiding meetings with cryptocurrency industry experts can only prove harmful in the long run. As conversations continue, I firmly believe this will help increase trust in digital assets.

What are your thoughts on the potential consequences of appointing crypto-friendly officials to key regulatory positions?

Well, crypto-friendly officials generally mean quicker decisions and a more positive outlook towards cryptocurrencies from key decision makers. I don’t see any downside to this move except that it will help improve policy making in the cryptocurrency industry. Anti-cryptocurrency crusades by uninformed officials will only boil over with time and most will have no choice but to go along with the agenda.

How might US political changes impact the growing interest in self-custody and privacy within the crypto community?

Changes in policy will have a significant impact on how cryptocurrencies influence the crypto landscape. Increased scrutiny will undermine the privacy features of some cryptocurrencies, as regulators may require a more rigorous approach to transaction traceability and transparency. Stricter KYC and AML requirements may be adopted.

And what might the broader implications be for cryptographic security and user autonomy?

This could also cause development in the industry, as better hardware and innovative cryptographic methods could arise from regulatory approaches with the aim of improving privacy and security. The downside could be that regulatory actions could cause a rift between the decentralization ideology that cryptocurrencies were created for and the centralized custodian services of the traditional financial system.

How do you think regulators will respond to the growing demand for privacy and self-protection in the cryptocurrency community?

Regulators have a few options for this. First, regulators could undertake educational initiatives to enlighten the public on the best ways to secure their tokens and use privacy-enhancing technologies. Second, startups and crypto companies could be allowed to test regulatory sandboxes for experimental purposes without full commitment to compliance requirements. This could help test privacy and self-custody solutions under supervised conditions. Another approach is to find a balance between privacy and regulation. Regulators can allow privacy features in cryptocurrencies, balancing them with the mandate to impose controls in case of illicit activity or terrorist financing.

What impact might growing political activism and organizing within the crypto community, such as the formation of crypto-focused PACs, have on the legislative process?

Since Coinbase and its major financial partners, Ripple and Andreessen Horowitz, invested approximately $161 million to spend on the 2024 US elections, the huge obstacle, the US legislature, has started to change its tune. Crypto-focused PACs are interested in increasing the number of pro-crypto members, and that is exactly what is being done. The next Senate and House of Representatives are expected to have more pro-crypto lawmakers than ever before. This can only mean one thing: more crypto-positive laws or regulations.

Could growing government support for cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology lead to a backlash from the traditional financial sector?

Traditional financial systems already see cryptocurrencies as a threat. With government support, cryptocurrencies could be at the top of the kill list. This can take several forms, including regulatory pressure from lawmakers, technological resistance by refusing to integrate cryptocurrencies into their operations, the imposition of barriers for crypto firms to operate on their platforms, and even public relations campaigns to discourage the public from adopting cryptocurrencies.

Source

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Regulation

South Korea Moves to Delay Cryptocurrency Tax Until 2028 Amid Market Concerns

Avatar

Published

on

South Korea moves to delay crypto tax until 2028 amid market concerns

South Korean lawmakers have proposed a bill to delay the tax on cryptocurrency earnings until 2028.

The ruling political party proposed the bill on July 12, citing current negative sentiment around the cryptocurrency sector as the reason for the extension. declared:

“With investor sentiment toward virtual assets deteriorating, some argue that hasty taxation of virtual assets is not desirable at this time, as virtual assets are high-risk assets with a higher risk of loss than stocks, and if income tax were also imposed, it is expected that most investors would abandon the market.”

South Korea had originally planned to implement its cryptocurrency earnings tax on January 1, 2025. However, if the new bill is passed, the implementation date will be moved to January 1, 2028. The subcommittee met on July 15 to continue the review.

The move is in line with President Yoon Suk-yeol’s campaign promisesHe assured voters that he would extend the cryptocurrency earnings tax during the last general election if elected. His administration aims to create a clear regulatory framework before implementing the tax.

However, the Ministry of Economy and Finance has not yet decided on the postponement. The ministry plans to announce new amendments to the fiscal policy by the end of the month.

“No decision has been made on further postponing the implementation of taxation of income from virtual activities,” a ministry spokesperson said. She said.

South Korea’s Thriving Cryptocurrency Industry

South Korea is one of the fastest-growing countries in the world in adopting this emerging sector.

In the first quarter of this year, blockchain platform Kaiko reported that the Asian country’s national currency, the Won, emerged as the leading currency for global cryptocurrency trading, with a cumulative trading volume of $456 billion across centralized exchanges.

Furthermore, the Asian country is a shining light for its proactivity approach to cryptocurrency regulationSouth Korea has implemented different rules designed to improve consumer protection standards for cryptocurrency users in its jurisdiction.

Latest stories from South Korea

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

ESAs consult on guidelines for cryptocurrency regulation

Avatar

Published

on

ESAs consult on guidelines for cryptocurrency regulation

THE European Supervisory Authoritiesincluding EBA, EIPA and ESMA, have published a consultation paper on guidelines under the Markets in Cryptocurrencies Regulation (MiCAR).

In doing so, the ESAs intended to develop templates for legal explanations and opinions regarding the classification of cryptocurrencies along with a standardized assessment to support a common approach to classification. In addition, the current move is intended to assist market participants and supervisors in accommodating a standardized test while receiving legal explanations and opinions that provide descriptions of the regulatory classification of cryptocurrencies in different cases. Among them, the ESAs mention:

  • Asset-Referenced Tokens (ART), whose white paper for their issuance must be accompanied by a legal opinion that highlights the classification of the crypto-asset, especially with regard to the fact that it is not an electronic money token (EMT) or a crypto-asset that could be excluded from the scope of MiCAR;

  • Cryptocurrencies that are not considered ART or EMT under the Regulation, for which the white paper must be accompanied by an explanation of the classification of the cryptocurrency, in particular information that is not an EMT, ART or a cryptocurrency are excluded from the scope of MiCAR.

As part of the press release, the ESAs mention that the consultation paper can be submitted directly from the consultation page, with a deadline for submissions of 12 October 2024. After holding a virtual public hearing on the consultation paper on 23 September 2023, the authorities are ready to publish all contributions, unless otherwise requested.

Background

In an effort to establish a framework for the provision of crypto-asset services, MiCAR develops regimes to regulate the issuance, supply to the public and admission to trading of EMT, ART and other crypto-assets. The draft was created under Article 97(1) of MiCAR, which requires authorities to jointly provide by 30 December 2024 the Guidelines pursuant to Article 16 of the ESA Regulations (EU Regulation) No. 1093/2010 Regulation 1094/2010, Regulation 1095/2010) to specify the content and form of the explanation accompanying the white paper on crypto-assets referred to in Article 8(4) and the legal opinions on the qualification of asset-referenced tokens (ARTs) referred to in Article 17(1), point (b)(ii) and Article 18(2), point (e) of MiCAR.

In addition, ESAs are required to include in the Guidelines a model for explanation and opinion and a standardized test for the classification of cryptocurrencies. At the time of the announcement, this was the only joint policy mandate of ESAs developed under MiCAR.

Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

Cryptocurrency News Today – July 15, 2024

Avatar

Published

on

Cryptocurrency News Today - July 15, 2024

Welcome to “Crypto News Today”, your daily digest of the cryptocurrency industry.

Bitcoin ETFs surge amid price recovery, market fluctuations

Bitcoin ETFs have seen their best weekly inflows since May, with $882 million in the week ending July 11. Bitcoin’s price has recovered to around $62,000, up 15% from its recent low, reflecting renewed investor interest and market optimism. To learn more, visit the TDR website!

Bitcoin Surpasses Leveraged ETFs

Bitcoin’s price has outperformed risky leveraged ETFs like BITX and BITU, demonstrating the cryptocurrency’s relative stability in a volatile market. Investors are increasingly favoring direct Bitcoin holdings over complex financial products.

SEC Closes Investigation into Hiro Systems

The SEC has concluded its three-year investigation into Stacks developer Hiro Systems without taking any enforcement action. The move brings relief to the company and its shareholders, potentially increasing confidence in the Stacks ecosystem.

Genesis Transfers 760 Million BTC to Coinbase

Amid a market sell-off, Genesis advanced $760 million in Bitcoin to Coinbase. The large transfer has raised speculation about potential trading strategies or liquidity by the digital asset company.

JP Morgan-Backed Partior Closes $60M Series B

JP Morgan-backed blockchain firm Partior has successfully closed a $60 million Series B funding round. The funds will support Partior’s mission to simplify cross-border payments and advance blockchain-based financial solutions.

Cryptocurrencies Become The Theme of 2024

Cryptocurrencies have emerged as a key issue in the 2024 political landscape, with parties and candidates debating regulation, innovation, and the future of digital currencies. This trend underscores the growing importance of cryptocurrencies in economic and political discussions.

Read more cryptocurrency news on the TDR website!

Want to stay up to date on Cannabis, AI, Small Cap and Crypto? Subscribe to our Daily Baked in Newsletter!



Source

Continue Reading

Regulation

How Cryptocurrency Firms Are Capitalizing on MiCA’s Bumpy Launch – DL News

Avatar

Published

on

How Cryptocurrency Firms Are Capitalizing on MiCA’s Bumpy Launch – DL News
  • The MiCA licensing regime will come into force at the end of December.
  • Levels of severity vary from country to country.
  • This will create opportunities for companies to engage.

Stablecoin laws have already come into force, but EU countries are rushing to comply with the rest of the Union’s new cryptocurrency regulation before the deadline.

The EU regulatory framework requires cryptocurrency businesses such as exchanges to choose a country in which to apply for a license. In practice, countries will inevitably have different levels of stringency.

The Markets in Crypto-Assets regulation is designed to introduce a level playing field across the EU, as national regulators will have to adhere to the same set of standards. Once licensed, crypto-asset service providers, or CASPs, can move their services anywhere in the bloc.

Additionally, countries are allowed to opt for longer transition periods before enforcing the MiCA rules. This is known as the grandfathering period.

All of this could call into question the level of compliance in some countries.

— Ernest Lima, XReg Consulting

That creates opportunities for cryptocurrency firms to seek out jurisdictions with lighter rules and less enforcement, said Ernest Lim, a partner at consultancy XReg. DL News.

“Cryptocurrency companies registered or licensed in different EU member states may be subject to different requirements” between January 2025 and July 2026, Lima said.

Due to time and capacity constraints, some local regulators may have difficulty processing applications in time for the deadline, he added.

“Some may not even have sufficient resources to adequately supervise licensed CASPs,” Lima said.

Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates

“All of this could call into question the level of compliance in some countries.”

Companies are already exploiting the patchy way MiCA regulations are enforced in the EU, in a practice known as regulatory arbitrage, Lima said.

Just the beginning

MiCA’s stablecoin laws went into effect on July 1st, marking the start of the launch.

The next stage is the MiCA licensing regime for cryptocurrency businesses, including exchanges, custodians and investment firms, which will come into force on December 30.

Although the new rules will be stricter, CASPs registered in one country will be able to offer their services throughout the EU27 under the MiCA ‘passporting’ provisions.

Some countries with simpler registration requirements already have significant numbers of VASPs on their registers.

Lima said he expects the number of CASPs in Europe to consolidate significantly, especially in those countries.

In countries with more flexible regulators, companies can benefit from a relatively simple registration process to enter Europe.

According to XReg data, for example, Lithuania has 588 VASPs, while Germany has 12.

Transition period

The MiCA safeguard period will also impact where companies apply for licenses, Lima said.

The grandfathering period is a transition starting on December 30, during which companies can switch to the more stringent CASP regime.

Countries can grant cryptocurrency firms up to 18 additional months from December 30, although the EU securities watchdog recommends a 12-month safeguard period.

In assessing how much time to give companies to transition to the CASP regime, countries will have considered “how prepared they are internally to process applications, the gap between MiCA and their current regime, and the number of companies currently registered in their jurisdictions, all of which influence the workload associated with the transition,” Lima said.

Some countries have announced their transition, others have not, he added.

Among those who have announced:

  • France will allow a ramp-up period of 18 months. The country already has a regime similar to MiCA in place.
  • Many countries, including Ireland, Germany, Spain and Austria, are opting for the recommended 12-month transition.
  • Lithuania, which has very lax AML requirements and a large number of registered VASPs, has been at a standstill for five months.
  • The Netherlands will implement the MiCA regime on 30 December and is already accepting applications.

Strategie

Lima said that cryptocurrency companies are evaluating different strategies to take advantage of this uneven distribution.

Some companies are aiming to comply as soon as possible, by December 30, which means they will be the first to avail themselves of passporting rights and gain market share in the EU.

“Others are opting to file multiple applications in EU jurisdictions,” he said.

This approach allows a firm to benefit from a transition period in a trusted jurisdiction while working on a MiCA application.

However, he said that time was running out: local regulators were preparing to start the MiCA application process.

“Soon there will be no more time to process new applications.”

Lima said some companies have no intention of ever complying with MiCA.

Instead, they chose to continue working as long as possible before closing their businesses for good.

Contact the author at joanna@dlnews.com.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 CHAINFEED.INFO. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.