News
Understand double spending and how to prevent attacks
What is double spending?
Double spending means spending the same cryptocurrency or blockchain token more than once. Cryptocurrency is a token that represents value on a distributed ledger, so without proper mechanisms, it would be easy to change a ledger entry and give you back the amount you spent.
Double spending isn’t just limited to cryptocurrency; is a problem in all blockchain projects. Here’s more information about this problem, how to fix it, and some steps you can take to avoid being a victim of it.
Key points
- Double spending is the ability to spend the same token more than once.
- Double spending is a feature of cryptocurrencies and tokens where ledger entries are maliciously altered.
- The proof-of-work mechanism, encryption method, and distributed consensus techniques used by Bitcoin and other blockchains prevent double spending.
- Ethereum and other blockchains use proof of stake, cryptography, and distributed consensus to prevent double spending.
Understanding double spending
Cryptocurrencies and blockchain it had been in development for many years before the introduction of Bitcoin. One of the many reasons they didn’t work until Bitcoin was that a problem needed to be solved: a user could change information on a distributed ledger to return all spent tokens to themselves.
This is a weakness in any digital money system, which is why third-party auditors have traditionally been involved. These auditors must spend time, which equals money, verifying transactions and amounts between parties. For this system to work, there must be trust among all parties involved that auditors, records managers, or other parties will not change entries to benefit themselves or others.
Prevent double spending
The solution presented by Satoshi Nakamoto, which involved timestamping transactions and linking them using cryptographic techniques, solved the double-spending problem. However, for this solution to work, a large and fast distributed network is needed to prevent malicious actors from altering transactions. Popular cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum are large enough to prevent double-spending attacks against the network, but individuals should still be cautious.
People using or investing in cryptocurrency should ensure that they do not accept unconfirmed transactions. Due to awareness of these attempts, many wallet creators program wallets that do not allow the acceptance of unconfirmed transactions. However, it’s best to check and make sure your wallet displays this information or prevents you from accepting one.
Double-spending attacks
The most significant double-spend risk for blockchains is a Attack at 51%.which can occur if one entity controls more than 50% of the hashing power or validation mechanisms on a network.
If this user, or users, take a majority of the network, network participation, or any other mechanism used, they will be able to dictate transaction consensus and control the allocation of currency. New or forked cryptocurrencies with smaller networks are susceptible to this attack. In cryptocurrency networks like Bitcoin, this is very unlikely due to the number of participants in the network and the speed at which the network operates.
Ethereum uses a betting mechanic, where only users who have locked large amounts of ether in smart contracts can become validators and propose blocks. To attempt this attack, a group or entity would have to control more than 50% of the Ether staked on the network – a very expensive endeavor because it takes 32 ETH (about $95,200 as of May 15, 2024) to establish a node, and there is also a mechanism that burns the tokens of dishonest validators.
Race attack
Racial attacks, also called unconfirmed transactions, occur when an attacker attempts to send two quick transactions, one to a recipient and one to the blockchain. That to a recipient could transfer them a token, but the transaction sent to the network would keep it in the sender’s possession. This is an attempt to exploit network delay, with the sender’s transaction confirmation establishing ownership.
This can be easily avoided by not accepting unconfirmed transactions.
Finney attack
A Finney attack, named after Hal Finney, the developer who reported the weakness, is a type of attack on unconfirmed transactions. However, this attack requires a miner to create a block and send an amount to two addresses owned by him. Another transaction is sent to another party in the same block. If the recipient accepts it before it is confirmed by the network, the sender can essentially return the amount sent and spend it again.
This attack is very rare on large blockchains but can be prevented by not accepting unconfirmed transactions or using a wallet that doesn’t allow you to accept them.
Attack of the Sibyl
A Sybil attack occurs when multiple nodes are created in an attempt to gain influence over a network. It looks like a 51% attack, but it’s on a smaller scale. Sybil attacks can be seen as precursors to 51% attacks.
Is double spending illegal?
Whether double spending is illegal depends on the circumstances. As for a cryptocurrency with market value, it is illegal because it commits fraud.
However, double spending is not limited to cryptocurrency. For example, imagine that a gaming community has created a blockchain to facilitate its voting processes, where one blockchain token represents one vote. The token has no monetary value and is not a cryptocurrency.
The players want to organize an event but are divided on where to do it. A vote seems like the best way to resolve the divide, so they vote. If someone initiated a double spending attack and changed people’s votes, those members’ tokens would be spent twice and the result would not be representative of the true result of the vote. This is generally not illegal, but it is unethical within the gaming community and may violate their terms of membership.
What is the meaning of double spending?
Double spending is the act of using the same digital currency or token more than once.
What is an example of a double spending problem?
Double spending alters a transaction on a blockchain or distributed ledger so that a spent token can be spent again.
How did Bitcoin solve double spending?
Satoshi Nakamoto’s Bitcoin solution consisted of using an encryption algorithm, distributed consensus, proof of work to validate transactions, and timestamps over a large, fast network.
The bottom line
A double-spending attack is an alteration in the functioning of a blockchain that allows the attacker to use a token more than once. Most often it is thought to be a cryptocurrency problem, but it can occur on blockchains and distributed ledgers.
Users can prevent a double-spending attack by not accepting unconfirmed transactions. Smaller networks are prone to double-spending attacks, so it is better to use cryptocurrencies and blockchains with larger networks.
The comments, opinions and analyzes expressed on Investopedia are for informational purposes only. Read ours warranty and exclusion of liability for more information.