Connect with us

Ethereum

Big Bitcoin blockers ‘were right,’ says Ethereum founder

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Big Bitcoin blockers 'were right,' says Ethereum founder

In a blog post, Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin returned to the crucial Bitcoin block size debate that deeply divided the Bitcoin community, primarily from 2015 to 2017. Engaging deeply in two authoritative books , Buterin re-examined the historical nuances of this schism from his unique perspective as both a participant and thought leader in the crypto space.

Buterin’s blog entrancetitled “Some Thoughts on the Bitcoin Blocksize War,” unveils the contrasting narratives provided by Jonathan Bier’s The Blocksize War and Roger Ver and Hijacking Bitcoin by Steve Patterson. These books represent the pro-small bloc and pro-large bloc viewpoints, respectively, offering insight into the ideological and technical divisions that characterized the debate.

Small Bitcoin Blockers Vs. Big blockers

Buterin described the small blocker perspective primarily through ideas from Bier’s book. This faction, keen to maintain the decentralized and user-accessible nature of Bitcoin, opposed a large increase in block size. They were concerned that larger blocks would require greater hardware requirements for node operators, potentially centralizing the network for those who could afford such setups.

A key quote highlighted by Buterin sums up this concern: “[If the block size were much bigger], you would need a large data center to run a node, and you won’t be able to do it anonymously. Additionally, Buterin described small blockers as being deeply involved in Bitcoin’s governance model.

They preferred infrequent, consensual changes to avoid the risks of centralized control and manipulation by a limited number of stakeholders. The 2017 New York Accord, which sought to resolve the block size dispute through compromise between major exchanges, miners and other stakeholders, has been cited as anathema to governance ideals small blockers, which favored control of the general user base over a company. consortium.

Conversely, the narrative of the big blockers, as detailed in the work of Ver and Patterson, paints a portrait of a group committed to the utility of Bitcoin as a “digital currency.” This group lamented the move toward viewing Bitcoin solely as a “store of value” or “digital gold,” which they said betrayed the original intent outlined in Satoshi NakamotoThe white paper.

Buterin relayed their arguments, emphasizing that large blocks were essential to keeping transaction fees low, thereby driving greater adoption and utility of Bitcoin for everyday transactions. Big blockers have also criticized layer 2 solutions like Lightning Networkwhich have been advocated by small blockers as alternative methods to manage transaction loads without increasing block sizes.

Ver and Patterson argued that such solutions were complex, required users to maintain perpetual online connections, and ultimately would not be scalable enough to meet global demand without also increasing the size of the BTC block.

In reflecting on his own position, Buterin revealed a nuanced position. Initially sympathetic to the big blockers due to practical concerns about high fees undermining Bitcoin’s utility, over time he expressed frustration with the extremes of both camps. He noticed :

In my opinion, the big blockers were right on the central question that the blocks needed to be bigger and that this was best achieved with a simple, clean hard fork like Satoshi described, but the small blockers have made far fewer embarrassing technical missteps and were proven right. fewer positions that led to absurd results if you tried to take them to their logical conclusion.

Buterin’s Lessons for Ethereum

Buterin advocates a balanced approach, emphasizing “medium predictability” of transaction costs and node operational requirements. He cited as an example Ethereum’s strategies, in which incremental increases in block capacity were coupled with fee adjustments to effectively manage growth and scalability.

Buterin lamented the omission of significant technological advances like ZK-SNARK in the speech, highlighting their potential to solve scalability and privacy issues without requiring divisive compromises. He suggested that the adoption of new technologies could defuse political tensions by proposing solutions that match the interests of different stakeholder groups. Buterin writes:

One incredibly glaring omission in both books stood out to me more than anything else: the word “ZK-SNARK” appeared exactly zero times in either book. There’s no real excuse for this: even by the mid-2010s, ZK-SNARKs and their potential to revolutionize scalability (and privacy) were well known. Zcash launched in October 2016. The scalability implications of ZK-SNARKs were explored a bit by Gregory Maxwell in 2013, but they don’t seem to be factored into discussions about the future roadmap at all. Bitcoin.

Buterin’s blog post serves not only as a reflection on a controversial chapter in Bitcoin’s history, but also as a cautionary tale for Ethereum and other blockchain communities. He highlighted the importance of inclusive governance and technological innovation to avoid “one-sided skills traps,” in which a lack of diverse skills and perspectives can stifle growth and lead to deep-rooted conflicts.

“I care about examining the successes and failures of Bitcoin, not because I want to bring down Bitcoin as a means to raise Ethereum; […] I care about analyzing these issues because Ethereum and other digital (and even physical) communities I care about have a lot to learn from understanding what happened, what went well, and what could have done better,” concluded Buterin.

At press time, BTC was trading at $68,498.

Bitcoin PriceBTC price trades below key resistance, 1-day chart | Source: BTCUSD on TradingView.com

Featured image from CNBC, chart from TradingView.com

Source

We are the editorial team of Chain Feed Staff, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Chain Feed Staff, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Ethereum

QCP sees Ethereum as a safe bet amid Bitcoin stagnation

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Facebook

QCP, a leading trading firm, has shared key observations on the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin’s struggle to surpass the $70,000 mark has led QCP to predict Selling pressure is still strong, with BTC likely to remain in a tight trading range. In the meantime, Ethereum (ETH) is seen as a more promising investment, with potential gains as ETH could catch up to BTC, thanks to decreasing ETHE outflows.

Read on to find out how you can benefit from it.

Bitcoin’s Struggle: The $70,000 Barrier

For the sixth time in a row, BTC has failed to break above the $70,000 mark. Bitcoin is at $66,048 after a sharp decline. Many investors sold Bitcoin to capitalize on the rising values, which caused a dramatic drop. The market is becoming increasingly skeptical about Bitcoin’s rise, with some investors lowering their expectations.

Despite the continued sell-off from Mt. Gox and the US government, the ETF market remains bullish. There is a notable trend in favor of Ethereum (ETH) ETFs as major bulls have started investing in ETFs, indicating a bullish sentiment for ETH.

QCP Telegram Update UnderlinesIncreased market volatility. The NASDAQ has fallen 10% from its peak, led by a pullback in major technology stocks. Currency carry trades are being unwound and the VIX, a measure of market volatility, has jumped to 19.50.

The main factors driving this uncertainty are Value at Risk (VaR) shocks, high stock market valuations and global risk aversion sentiment. Commodities such as oil and copper have also declined on fears of an economic slowdown.

Additionally, QCP anticipates increased market volatility ahead of the upcoming FOMC meeting, highlighting the importance of the Federal Reserve’s statement and Jerome Powell’s subsequent press conference.

A glimmer of hope

QCP notes a positive development in the crypto space with an inflow of $33.7 million into ETH spot ETFs, which is giving a much-needed boost to ETH prices. However, they anticipate continued outflows of ETHE in the coming weeks. The recent Silk Road BTC moves by the US government have added to the market uncertainty.

QCP suggests a strategic trade involving BTC, which will likely remain in its current range, while ETH offers a more promising opportunity. They propose a trade targeting a $4,000-$4,500 range for ETH, which could generate a 5.5x return by August 30, 2024.

Source

Continue Reading

Ethereum

Ethereum Whale Resurfaces After 9 Years, Moves 1,111 ETH Worth $3.7 Million

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Ethereum records $17.9 billion in spot volume despite 3% drop

An Ethereum ICO participant has emerged from nearly a decade of inactivity.

Lookonchain, a smart on-chain money tracking tool, revealed On X, this long-inactive participant recently transferred 1,111 ETH, worth approximately $3.7 million, to a new wallet. This significant move marks a notable on-chain movement, given the participant’s prolonged dormancy.

The Ethereum account in question, identified as 0xE727E67E…B02B5bFC6, received 2,000 ETH on the Genesis block over 9 years ago.

Screenshot 2024 07 30 at 171307

This initial allocation took place during the Ethereum ICOwhere the participant invested in ETH at around $0.31 per coin. The initial investment, worth around $620 at the time, has now grown to millions of dollars.

Recent Transactions and Movements

The inactive account became active again with several notable output transactions. Specifically, the account transferred 1,000 ETH, 100 ETH, 10 ETH, 1 ETH, and 1 more ETH to address 0x7C21775C…2E9dCaE28 within a few minutes. Additionally, it moved 1 ETH to 0x2aa31476…f5aaCE9B.

Additionally, in the latest round of transactions, the address transferred 737,995 ETH, 50 ETH, and 100 ETH, for a total of 887,995 ETH. These recent activities highlight a significant movement of funds, sparking interest and speculation in the crypto community.

Why are whales reactivating?

It is also evident that apart from 0xE727E67E…B02B5bFC6, other previously dormant Ethereum whales are waking up with significant transfers.

In May, another dormant Ethereum whale made headlines when it staked 4,032 ETHvalued at $7.4 million, after more than two years of inactivity. This whale initially acquired 60,000 ETH during the Genesis block of Ethereum’s mainnet in 2015.

At the time, this activity could have been related to Ethereum’s upgrade known as “Shanghai,” which improved the network’s scalability and performance. This whale likely intended to capitalize on the price surge that occurred after the upgrade.

Disclaimer: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The opinions expressed in this article may include the personal opinions of the author and do not reflect the opinion of The Crypto Basic. Readers are encouraged to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

-Advertisement-

Source

Continue Reading

Ethereum

Only Bitcoin and Ethereum are viable for ETFs in the near future

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Only Bitcoin and Ethereum are viable for ETFs in the near future

BlackRock: Only Bitcoin and Ethereum Are Viable for ETFs in the Near Future

Bitcoin and Ethereum will be the only cryptocurrencies traded via ETFs in the near future, according to Samara Cohen, chief investment officer of ETFs and indices at BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager.

In an interview with Bloomberg TV, Cohen explained that while Bitcoin and Ethereum have met BlackRock’s rigorous criteria for exchange-traded funds (ETFs), no other digital asset currently comes close. “We’re really looking at the investability to see what meets the criteria, what meets the criteria that we want to achieve in an ETF,” Cohen said. “Both in terms of the investability and from what we’re hearing from our clients, Bitcoin and Ethereum definitely meet those criteria, but it’s going to be a while before we see anything else.”

Cohen noted that beyond the technical challenges of launching new ETFs, the demand for other crypto ETFs, particularly Solana, is not there yet. While Solana is being touted as the next potential ETF candidate, Cohen noted that the market appetite remains lacking.

BlackRock’s interest in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs comes after the successful launch of Ethereum ETFs last week, which saw weekly trading volume for the crypto fund soar to $14.8 billion, the highest level since May. The success has fueled speculation about the next possible ETF, with Solana frequently mentioned as a contender.

Solana, known as a faster and cheaper alternative to Ethereum, has been the subject of two separate ETF filings in the US by VanEck and 21Shares. However, the lack of CME Solana futures, unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum, is a significant hurdle for SEC approval of a Solana ETF.

Despite these challenges, some fund managers remain optimistic about Solana’s potential. Franklin Templeton recently described Solana as an “exciting and major development that we believe will drive the crypto space forward.” Solana currently accounts for about 3% of the overall cryptocurrency market value, with a market cap of $82 billion, according to data from CoinGecko.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin investors continue to show strong support, as evidenced by substantial inflows into BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ: IBIT). On July 22, IBIT reported inflows of $526.7 million, the highest single-day total since March. This impressive haul stands in stark contrast to the collective inflow of just $6.9 million seen across the remaining 10 Bitcoin ETFs, according to data from Farside Investors. The surge in IBIT inflows coincides with Bitcoin’s significant $68,000 level, just 8% off its all-time high of $73,000.

Source

Continue Reading

Ethereum

Ethereum Posts First Consecutive Monthly Losses Since August 2023 on New ETFs

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Ethereum sees first monthly consecutive losses since August 2023 amid new ETFs

Available exclusively via

Bitcoin ETF vs Ethereum: A Detailed Comparison of IBIT and ETHA

Andjela Radmilac · 3 days ago

CryptoSlate’s latest market report takes an in-depth look at the technical and practical differences between IBIT and BlackRock’s ETHA to explain how these products work.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 CHAINFEED.INFO. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.