Connect with us

Ethereum

Analysis of the EthPrague fireside chat by Vitalik Buterin and Gavin Wood

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Analysis of the EthPrague fireside chat by Vitalik Buterin and Gavin Wood

The meeting revealed how far the two men have come from their origins as blockchain founders and… [+] opinion leaders

getty

Ten years after Ethereum co-founders holed up in Switzerland to launch the OG smart contracts platform, two of them came together again in a rare joint public appearance at the recent EthPrague event. Given Gavin Wood’s early breakup from the Ethereum project, after which he left to launch Polkadot, this was always going to be an intriguing meeting. There has certainly been enough evidence of rivalry between projects over the years. However, the EthPrague meeting was compelling, not because of any visible conflict between the two men, but because of what it revealed about the journey the two men had taken since their origins as founders blockchain and opinion leaders.

It is worth remembering that Polkadot has been conceived to overcome what Wood perceived as problems with Ethereum. These ranged from the practical – scalability and fees – to the more nuanced, around the challenges of decentralized governance. However, much of what Wood shared during the interview with Buterin hinted at his evolving thinking on these topics.

Wood opened the discussion with an unusually candid statement from a founder – that his thinking has changed. Polkadot’s multi-chain architecture was designed to be more scalable by separating application activity from security and consensus using a sharded structure. However, Wood believes this model has led to what he calls “persistent state fragmentation” across the system, since each parachain or rollup does not necessarily communicate with others except through the security layer .

A new one launched Polkadot initiative, named JAM, brings the scalability of rollup to the consensus layer, effectively reducing fragmentation and unifying activity within a single chain. However, the technical aspects are perhaps less striking than the fact that Wood is quite open about the journey he’s taken as a developer and founder. This conference also highlights that while public blockchain projects are operational systems supporting assets worth billions, the processes and operations behind them are often still at the cutting edge of pioneering technologies.

The conversation didn’t become less introspective. At this point, it’s worth praising the ETH Prague moderator for keeping the line of questions at a high level, as this is where both are at their best, debating the most difficult issues in the blockchain. One question focused on the challenges of community building, positing the idea that conflict is a necessary element to progress in blockchain development and drawing on examples such as the Ethereum hard fork which led to Ethereum Classic.

On this topic, Wood acknowledged with humility that Ethereum’s relatively moderate approach to governance has been a key factor in building its large and vibrant community. However, the main challenge is that a large community inhibits agile decision-making – a challenge he was keen to avoid when designing Polkadot.

This discussion is as old as technology itself, and the debate primarily focused on the concepts of on-chain and off-chain governance. Proponents of the former have argued that while the “code is law” approach can be restrictive, it is less complicated than off-chain voting, which can lead to factions and, ultimately, forks.

In this regard, both men appear to be more comfortable with the idea that neither approach necessarily trumps the other.

For his part, Wood was less opinionated on the need for a base layer to upgrade itself, while Buterin expressed interest in more formalized public signaling methods for governance of Ethereum – a development that could become more urgent depending on recent discoveries from Galaxy Digital regarding potential centralization in Etheruem’s decision-making.

This shift in mentality reflects a more mature, relaxed and democratic approach than the often binary and polarizing arguments that became characteristic of blockchain’s early years. If these two thought leaders at the forefront of technological development can unite around topics that were previously points of contention, it bodes well for the future of the industry.

Source

We are the editorial team of Chain Feed Staff, where seriousness meets clarity in cryptocurrency analysis. With a robust team of finance and blockchain technology experts, we are dedicated to meticulously exploring complex crypto markets with detailed assessments and an unbiased approach. Our mission is to democratize access to knowledge of emerging financial technologies, ensuring they are understandable and accessible to all. In every article on Chain Feed Staff, we strive to provide content that not only educates, but also empowers our readers, facilitating their integration into the financial digital age.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Información básica sobre protección de datos Ver más

  • Responsable: Miguel Mamador.
  • Finalidad:  Moderar los comentarios.
  • Legitimación:  Por consentimiento del interesado.
  • Destinatarios y encargados de tratamiento:  No se ceden o comunican datos a terceros para prestar este servicio. El Titular ha contratado los servicios de alojamiento web a Banahosting que actúa como encargado de tratamiento.
  • Derechos: Acceder, rectificar y suprimir los datos.
  • Información Adicional: Puede consultar la información detallada en la Política de Privacidad.

Ethereum

QCP sees Ethereum as a safe bet amid Bitcoin stagnation

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Facebook

QCP, a leading trading firm, has shared key observations on the cryptocurrency market. Bitcoin’s struggle to surpass the $70,000 mark has led QCP to predict Selling pressure is still strong, with BTC likely to remain in a tight trading range. In the meantime, Ethereum (ETH) is seen as a more promising investment, with potential gains as ETH could catch up to BTC, thanks to decreasing ETHE outflows.

Read on to find out how you can benefit from it.

Bitcoin’s Struggle: The $70,000 Barrier

For the sixth time in a row, BTC has failed to break above the $70,000 mark. Bitcoin is at $66,048 after a sharp decline. Many investors sold Bitcoin to capitalize on the rising values, which caused a dramatic drop. The market is becoming increasingly skeptical about Bitcoin’s rise, with some investors lowering their expectations.

Despite the continued sell-off from Mt. Gox and the US government, the ETF market remains bullish. There is a notable trend in favor of Ethereum (ETH) ETFs as major bulls have started investing in ETFs, indicating a bullish sentiment for ETH.

QCP Telegram Update UnderlinesIncreased market volatility. The NASDAQ has fallen 10% from its peak, led by a pullback in major technology stocks. Currency carry trades are being unwound and the VIX, a measure of market volatility, has jumped to 19.50.

The main factors driving this uncertainty are Value at Risk (VaR) shocks, high stock market valuations and global risk aversion sentiment. Commodities such as oil and copper have also declined on fears of an economic slowdown.

Additionally, QCP anticipates increased market volatility ahead of the upcoming FOMC meeting, highlighting the importance of the Federal Reserve’s statement and Jerome Powell’s subsequent press conference.

A glimmer of hope

QCP notes a positive development in the crypto space with an inflow of $33.7 million into ETH spot ETFs, which is giving a much-needed boost to ETH prices. However, they anticipate continued outflows of ETHE in the coming weeks. The recent Silk Road BTC moves by the US government have added to the market uncertainty.

QCP suggests a strategic trade involving BTC, which will likely remain in its current range, while ETH offers a more promising opportunity. They propose a trade targeting a $4,000-$4,500 range for ETH, which could generate a 5.5x return by August 30, 2024.

Source

Continue Reading

Ethereum

Ethereum Whale Resurfaces After 9 Years, Moves 1,111 ETH Worth $3.7 Million

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Ethereum records $17.9 billion in spot volume despite 3% drop

An Ethereum ICO participant has emerged from nearly a decade of inactivity.

Lookonchain, a smart on-chain money tracking tool, revealed On X, this long-inactive participant recently transferred 1,111 ETH, worth approximately $3.7 million, to a new wallet. This significant move marks a notable on-chain movement, given the participant’s prolonged dormancy.

The Ethereum account in question, identified as 0xE727E67E…B02B5bFC6, received 2,000 ETH on the Genesis block over 9 years ago.

Screenshot 2024 07 30 at 171307

This initial allocation took place during the Ethereum ICOwhere the participant invested in ETH at around $0.31 per coin. The initial investment, worth around $620 at the time, has now grown to millions of dollars.

Recent Transactions and Movements

The inactive account became active again with several notable output transactions. Specifically, the account transferred 1,000 ETH, 100 ETH, 10 ETH, 1 ETH, and 1 more ETH to address 0x7C21775C…2E9dCaE28 within a few minutes. Additionally, it moved 1 ETH to 0x2aa31476…f5aaCE9B.

Additionally, in the latest round of transactions, the address transferred 737,995 ETH, 50 ETH, and 100 ETH, for a total of 887,995 ETH. These recent activities highlight a significant movement of funds, sparking interest and speculation in the crypto community.

Why are whales reactivating?

It is also evident that apart from 0xE727E67E…B02B5bFC6, other previously dormant Ethereum whales are waking up with significant transfers.

In May, another dormant Ethereum whale made headlines when it staked 4,032 ETHvalued at $7.4 million, after more than two years of inactivity. This whale initially acquired 60,000 ETH during the Genesis block of Ethereum’s mainnet in 2015.

At the time, this activity could have been related to Ethereum’s upgrade known as “Shanghai,” which improved the network’s scalability and performance. This whale likely intended to capitalize on the price surge that occurred after the upgrade.

Disclaimer: This content is informational and should not be considered financial advice. The opinions expressed in this article may include the personal opinions of the author and do not reflect the opinion of The Crypto Basic. Readers are encouraged to conduct thorough research before making any investment decisions. The Crypto Basic is not responsible for any financial losses.

-Advertisement-

Source

Continue Reading

Ethereum

Only Bitcoin and Ethereum are viable for ETFs in the near future

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Only Bitcoin and Ethereum are viable for ETFs in the near future

BlackRock: Only Bitcoin and Ethereum Are Viable for ETFs in the Near Future

Bitcoin and Ethereum will be the only cryptocurrencies traded via ETFs in the near future, according to Samara Cohen, chief investment officer of ETFs and indices at BlackRock, the world’s largest asset manager.

In an interview with Bloomberg TV, Cohen explained that while Bitcoin and Ethereum have met BlackRock’s rigorous criteria for exchange-traded funds (ETFs), no other digital asset currently comes close. “We’re really looking at the investability to see what meets the criteria, what meets the criteria that we want to achieve in an ETF,” Cohen said. “Both in terms of the investability and from what we’re hearing from our clients, Bitcoin and Ethereum definitely meet those criteria, but it’s going to be a while before we see anything else.”

Cohen noted that beyond the technical challenges of launching new ETFs, the demand for other crypto ETFs, particularly Solana, is not there yet. While Solana is being touted as the next potential ETF candidate, Cohen noted that the market appetite remains lacking.

BlackRock’s interest in Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs comes after the successful launch of Ethereum ETFs last week, which saw weekly trading volume for the crypto fund soar to $14.8 billion, the highest level since May. The success has fueled speculation about the next possible ETF, with Solana frequently mentioned as a contender.

Solana, known as a faster and cheaper alternative to Ethereum, has been the subject of two separate ETF filings in the US by VanEck and 21Shares. However, the lack of CME Solana futures, unlike Bitcoin and Ethereum, is a significant hurdle for SEC approval of a Solana ETF.

Despite these challenges, some fund managers remain optimistic about Solana’s potential. Franklin Templeton recently described Solana as an “exciting and major development that we believe will drive the crypto space forward.” Solana currently accounts for about 3% of the overall cryptocurrency market value, with a market cap of $82 billion, according to data from CoinGecko.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin investors continue to show strong support, as evidenced by substantial inflows into BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (NASDAQ: IBIT). On July 22, IBIT reported inflows of $526.7 million, the highest single-day total since March. This impressive haul stands in stark contrast to the collective inflow of just $6.9 million seen across the remaining 10 Bitcoin ETFs, according to data from Farside Investors. The surge in IBIT inflows coincides with Bitcoin’s significant $68,000 level, just 8% off its all-time high of $73,000.

Source

Continue Reading

Ethereum

Ethereum Posts First Consecutive Monthly Losses Since August 2023 on New ETFs

Chain Feed Staff

Published

on

Ethereum sees first monthly consecutive losses since August 2023 amid new ETFs

Available exclusively via

Bitcoin ETF vs Ethereum: A Detailed Comparison of IBIT and ETHA

Andjela Radmilac · 3 days ago

CryptoSlate’s latest market report takes an in-depth look at the technical and practical differences between IBIT and BlackRock’s ETHA to explain how these products work.

Source

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 CHAINFEED.INFO. All rights reserved. This website provides educational content and highlights that investing involves risks. It is essential to conduct thorough research before investing and to be prepared to assume potential losses. Be sure to fully understand the risks involved before making investment decisions. Important: We do not provide financial or investment advice. All content is presented for educational purposes only.