Regulation

Through the Looking Glass: US Internal Revenue Service Finalizes Cryptocurrency Tax Reporting Regulations | Insights

Published

4 months ago

22 July, 2024

Through the Looking Glass: US Internal Revenue Service Finalizes Cryptocurrency Tax Reporting Regulations | Insights

In August 2023, the US Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) proposed regulations to fulfill the Congressional mandate to require US tax reporting of digital asset transactions by brokers and other intermediaries.1 After evaluating more than 44,000 comments, the IRS has reworked the proposed regulations and issued them in final form. The final regulations were published in the Federal Register on July 9, 2024, and will generally be effective for transactions undertaken in 2025 and thereafter. This means actual reporting must be made beginning in 2026. This Legal Update updates our 2023 Legal Update on the proposed regulations and summarizes, in Q&A format, the key takeaways from the final regulations and the changes from the proposed regulations.

I. What Transactions Will Be Subject to Information Reporting?

The final regulations retain the proposed regulations’ mandate that most dispositions of digital assets will be subject to information reporting, including dispositions for cash, digital assets that differ “materially in kind or extent,”2 stored value cards, broker services or certain other property.3 Under an IRS Notice published with the final regulations, reporting is reserved with respect to certain exchanges of digital assets for other digital assets.

Dispositions must be reported on new IRS Form 1099-DA.4 While the direct purchase of goods and services with cryptocurrencies generally will not be subject to reporting, if the property acquired is subject to other reporting requirements (including for stock and real estate), the cryptocurrency used to acquire that property becomes reportable. And, although direct purchases paid for with cryptocurrency are not subject to reporting, if the transaction is processed by an intermediary, the intermediary will have tax reporting requirements as a digital asset middleman. Cryptocurrencies received in hard forks and airdrops are not subject to reporting. Loans of digital assets are exempt from information reporting. But the IRS has stated that is likely to change this regulation in the future.

Derivatives

Speaking of financial transactions involving cryptocurrencies, tax reporting for option and forward contract transactions will be determined based on whether the option or forward contract is blockchain-traded, not based on the property subject to the option or contract.5 If the option or forward contract is not blockchain-traded, even if the derivative references a digital asset, it remains subject to the existing regulations for option and forward contract reporting.6 In the case of both options and forward contracts that are not blockchain-traded, however, if the option or forward is physically settled in cryptocurrency, digital asset reporting will be required for the settlement. Other physically settled derivatives involving cryptocurrencies also will be subject to information reporting.7 This regime extends to swaps as well; although swaps generally are exempt from information reporting, if the swap if blockchain-traded, it is subject to digital asset reporting. Under a Notice issued contemporaneously with the final regulations,8 however, this reporting is currently suspended while the IRS considers this issue further.

If a broker executes a transaction that is internal to its platform, such as matching buy-sell orders with inventory instead of by purchasing cryptocurrency in an open market transaction to fill an order, the transaction remains subject to information reporting. Reporting will be required even if the exchange ledger is not widely distributed (e.g., it is private or permissioned).

The final regulations refine the rules for dual classification assets for US federal tax purposes; that is, an asset that is both a digital asset and a security or commodity. (The final regulations set the reporting obligations for real estate held through a distributed ledger under the real estate reporting regulations.) Stablecoins are treated as digital assets and are not treated as dual classification assets. If a transaction constitutes both a securities transaction and a digital asset transaction, it will be reportable only as a digital asset transaction.9 Similarly, the digital asset reporting regulations, and not the commodity reporting regulations, will apply to digital asset transactions that also meet the definition of a commodity transaction. (The definition of commodity has been expanded to include assets that are self-certified to the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.)

The IRS issued several exceptions to the regulations described above:

Digital asset reporting is not required on transfers of digital assets between regulated financial entities to facilitate processing, clearing, or settlement of orders on certain limited-access networks;
Blockchain-traded Section 1256 contracts (“60/40 contracts”) remain subject to securities reporting requirements and not digital asset reporting, even if blockchain-traded;
Blockchain-traded money market funds remain subject to securities reporting and not digital asset reporting;
Digital asset reporting is not required on closed-loop transactions in which the cryptocurrency cannot be sold outside the system for fiat currency (which does not include permissioned ledger platforms); and
Digital asset reporting is not required on transfers of loyalty nonfungible tokens (“NFTs”) that cannot be exchanged outside of a program’s closed network.

De Minimis Exceptions

The final regulations introduce de minimis thresholds for reporting sales of qualifying purchases of digital assets from processors of digital assets payments (“PDAP”) (i.e., disposition of digital assets for cash, different digital assets, broker services, etc.), qualifying stablecoins, and non-financial NFTs, as well as alternative aggregate reporting for qualifying stablecoins, annual PDAP transactions of $600 or less, and certain NFTs.10 There is a $25,000 annual de minimis exception for qualifying stablecoin transactions.

Payments of gas fees, staking fees, and like amounts are treated as dispositions of cryptocurrency under the proposed regulations. Accordingly, the payment of these fees will trigger tax reporting. There is no de minimis exception for these types of dispositions.

II. Who Will Be Required To Provide Information Reporting on Digital Asset Transactions?

The new reporting requirements apply to “brokers,” including digital asset middlemen.11 For US federal tax purposes, a broker includes digital asset platforms, payment processors, hosted wallet providers, and issuers of cryptocurrencies that regularly offer to redeem their digital currencies, such as stablecoin issuers. Digital asset middlemen include “any person that provides facilitative services that effectuate sales of digital assets by customers,” provided that such person is in a position to know the identity of the party that makes the sale and the nature of the transaction.12 Generally, a person that controls the payment services for cryptocurrency payments will be considered to have the ability to control the transaction. Regularity of activity will bear on whether a person is acting as a broker.

The final regulations do not include reporting requirements for non-custodial digital asset trading platforms and unhosted digital asset wallet providers. The IRS continues to study whether non-custodial platforms should have reporting responsibilities.

The final regulations narrow the reporting rules for PDAPs. PDAPs have reporting responsibilities only if the processor has the right to obtain customer information under its anti-money laundering requirements. PDAPs are further limited to companies that have agreements with buyers to provide services. Accordingly, a PDAP attached to a seller won’t have reporting obligations. In addition, a PDAP doesn’t have a reporting obligation unless it takes possession of the cryptocurrency.

A significant change from the proposed regulations is that the IRS scaled back the definition of “broker” to exclude non-custodial industry participants (e.g., decentralized finance exchanges and unhosted digital asset wallet providers). An unhosted wallet provider that solely provides the software for a consumer to hold and transfer digital assets—and that does not, and cannot, process gross proceeds—will not be treated as a broker for US federal tax purposes.13 Hosted wallet providers that electronically store the private keys to digital assets on behalf of users, as well as payment processors, including credit card companies, that facilitate the payment for cash, goods, other cryptocurrencies, and services for cryptocurrencies, however, will be treated as brokers for US federal tax purposes. The final IRS regulations do not impact other regulatory analyses.

One major concern of the proposed regulations was cascading reporting—that is, each broker in a chain or reportable transaction was required to file an IRS Form 1099-DA. The final regulations seek to mitigate this over-reporting by foreshadowing changes to the IRS Form W-9. The to-be-revised IRS Form W-9 will contain a box allowing a digital asset broker to certify that it will undertake reporting, thereby relieving the Form recipient from duplicative reporting. Cascading reporting is ameliorated for broker fees, which, under the final regulations, can be reported together with the transaction generating such fees.

Stablecoin issuers that redeem their stablecoins for cash are treated as brokers for US federal tax purposes. As stated above, merchants that accept digital assets for goods and services, however, will not be treated as brokers for US federal tax purposes.

The final regulations exempt non-US brokers (other than foreign partnerships controlled by US persons) from the cryptocurrency tax reporting regulations on US persons. The IRS expects that final regulations will be provided once the United States adheres to the OECD crypto-asset reporting framework (“CARF”). The preamble to the final regulations states that, for US federal tax purposes, foreign brokers reporting certain sales of cryptocurrencies under the CARF regime will be exempt from the new reporting regulations, as they will providing information via that regime.

Complex regulations are proposed to distinguish sales effected by US brokers, non-US brokers and controlled foreign corporations.

III. Which Assets Will Be Subject to Reporting?

The final regulations retain the rule that stablecoins and NFTs—in addition to cryptocurrencies—are subject to new reporting requirements. The final regulations permit sellers to specifically identify which digital assets have been sold, allowing taxpayers to dispose of high-basis assets prior to disposing of low-basis assets. In the absence of a taxpayer identification, a broker must report dispositions on a FIFO (first-in, first-out) basis.

IV. Who Is Exempt from Information Reporting?

The existing list of tax reporting “exempt recipients” will carry over to the cryptocurrency reporting regime. Accordingly, most foreign persons, corporations, financial institutions, and tax-exempt organizations will not be subject to cryptocurrency tax reporting. In a reversal of the position taken in the proposed regulations, transactions between digital asset brokers will be exempt from reporting for US federal tax purposes.

V. What Must Be Reported Under the Proposed Reporting Regulations?

The final regulations reduce the information to be reported by the broker to the IRS and the taxpayer to the following five items:

Name, address, and taxpayer identification number of the payer;
Gross proceeds (dollars or the dollar fair market value of goods and services, reduced by transaction costs);
Transaction ID (if any);
Consideration received for the cryptocurrency (which may be determined by a digital asset aggregator); and
If the transaction involves a hosted wallet, the information necessary to identify the wallet and the amount originally transferred into the wallet.

Special reporting regulations are provided for tokenized securities to ensure compliance with wash sale reporting. Tokenized securities include any asset required to be registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Stablecoins, however, are not treated as tokenized securities.

VI. When Will These Regulations Be Applicable?

As noted above, the final reporting regulations generally are effective for transactions undertaken in 2025. Basis reporting, however, is delayed. Although Section 80603(b)(1) of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act mandates basis reporting requirements for cryptocurrency acquisitions that occur on or after January 1, 2023, the final regulations mandate basis reporting for digital assets acquired in 2026 and after (as opposed to the 2023 date in the proposed regulations). In addition, when a customer transfers digital assets to a new broker, the transferring broker will not be required to provide the basis information to the transferee broker (for now). Brokers may not rely on customer-provided information for basis information.

***

Mark Leeds (mleeds@mayerbrown.com; (212) 506-2499) is a tax partner, and Don F. Irwin (dirwin@mayerbrown.com; (212) 506-2792) is a corporate associate, with Mayer Brown LLP’s New York office. Mark’s professional practice focuses on the federal income tax considerations and planning for a variety of capital and digital asset market transactions. Don’s practice focuses on the regulatory and structural considerations posed by individuals and companies working in the digital asset space.

1 At that time, Mayer Brown issued a Legal Update that described the proposed digital asset reporting rules.

2 The final regulations do not offer any guidance on when the IRS believes that one cryptocurrency materially differs from another cryptocurrency.

3 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(9).

4 The final IRS Form 1099-DA is yet to be released as of the date of publication; however, a draft form was provided in April 2024.

5 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(e)(9)(ii).

6 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(e)(9)(i).

7 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(9)(ii)(A)(3).

8 Notice 2024-57.

9 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(c)(8)(i).

10 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(9)(ii)(D).

11 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(1).

12 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(10). The “position to know” standard is taken from the Financial Action Task Force (“FATF”) recommendations.

13 Treas. Reg. § 1.6045-1(a)(1).

Source

Regulation

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Published

4 months ago

1 August, 2024

Chain Feed Staff

Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia 2024

Slovenia, a small but highly developed European country with a population of 2.1 million, boasts a rich industrial history that has contributed significantly to its robust economy. As the most economically developed Slavic nation, Slovenia has grown steadily since adopting the euro in 2007. Its openness to innovation has been a key factor in its success in the industrial sector, making it a favorite destination for cryptocurrency enthusiasts. Many believe that Slovenia is poised to become a powerful fintech hub in Europe. But does its current cryptocurrency regulatory framework support such aspirations?

Let’s explore Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulations and see if they can push the country to the forefront of the cryptocurrency scene. My expectations are positive. What are yours? Before we answer, let’s dig deeper.

1. Cryptocurrency Regulation in Slovenia: An Overview

Slovenia is known for its pro-innovation stance, providing a supportive environment for emerging technologies such as blockchain and cryptocurrencies. Under the Payment Services and Systems Act, cryptocurrencies are classified as virtual assets rather than financial or monetary instruments.

Regulation of the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia is decentralized. Different authorities manage different aspects of the ecosystem. For example, the Bank of Slovenia and the Securities Market Agency supervise cryptocurrency transactions to ensure compliance with financial laws, including anti-money laundering (AML) and counter-terrorist financing regulations. The Slovenian Act on the Prevention of Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing (ZPPDFT-2) incorporates the EU’s Fifth Anti-Money Laundering Directive (5MLD) and aligns with the latest FATF recommendations. All virtual currency service providers must register with the Office of the Republic of Slovenia.

2. Cryptocurrency regulation in Slovenia: what’s new?

This year, there have been several noteworthy developments in the cryptocurrency sector in Slovenia:

July 25, 2024: Slovenia has issued a €30 million on-chain sovereign digital bond, the first of its kind in the EU, with a yield of 3.65%, maturing on 25 November 2024.

May 14, 2024: NiceHash has announced the first Slovenian Bitcoin-focused conference, NiceHashX, scheduled for November 8-9 in Maribor.

3. Explanation of the legal framework for cryptocurrency taxation in Slovenia

Slovenia’s cryptocurrency tax framework provides clear guidelines for both individuals and businesses. According to the Slovenian Tax Administration, tax treatment depends on the status of the trader and the nature of the transaction.

Individuals: Income earned from cryptocurrencies through employment or ongoing business activities is subject to personal income tax. However, capital gains from trading or market fluctuations are exempt from taxation.
Society: Capital gains from cryptocurrency activities are subject to a corporate income tax of 19%. Value added tax (VAT) generally applies at a rate of 22%, although cryptocurrency transactions considered as means of payment are exempt from VAT. Companies are not allowed to limit payment methods to cryptocurrencies only. Tokens issued during ICOs must comply with standard accounting rules and the Corporate Tax Act.

4. Cryptocurrency Mining in Slovenia: What You Should Know

Cryptocurrency mining is not restricted in Slovenia, but the income from mining is considered business income and is therefore taxable. This includes rewards from validating transactions and any additional income from mining operations. Both natural persons and legal entities must comply with Slovenian tax regulations.

5. Timeline of the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia

Here is a timeline highlighting the evolution of cryptocurrency regulations in Slovenia:

2013:The Slovenian Tax Administration has issued guidelines according to which income from cryptocurrency transactions should be taxed.
2017:The Slovenian Tax Administration has provided more detailed guidelines on cryptocurrency taxation, based on factors such as the trader’s status and the type of transaction.
2023The EU has adopted the Markets in Cryptocurrencies Regulation (MiCA), which establishes a uniform regulatory framework for cryptocurrencies, their issuers and service providers across the EU.

Final note

Slovenia’s approach to the cryptocurrency industry is commendable, reflecting its optimistic view of the future of cryptocurrency. The country’s balanced regulatory framework supports cryptocurrency innovation while protecting user rights and preventing illegal activities. Recent developments demonstrate Slovenia’s commitment to continuously improving its regulatory environment. Slovenia’s cryptocurrency regulatory framework sets a positive example for other nations navigating the evolving cryptocurrency landscape.

Source

Regulation

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris’ Regulatory Opportunity

Published

4 months ago

1 August, 2024

Chain Feed Staff

A Blank Slate for Cryptocurrencies: Kamala Harris' Regulatory Opportunity

Photo by The Dhage of Shubham ON Disinfect

As the cryptocurrency landscape continues to evolve, the need for clear regulation has never been greater.

Vice President Kamala Harris is now leading the charge on digital asset regulation in the United States, presenting a unique opportunity for a clean slate. This fresh start can foster innovation and protect consumers. It can also pave the way for widespread adoption across industries, including real estate agencies, healthcare providers, and online gambling platforms like these online casinos in the uk. According to experts at SafestCasinoSites, these platforms have advantages such as bonus offers, a wide selection of games, and various payment methods. Ultimately, all this increased adoption could push the cryptocurrency market forward.

With that in mind, let’s take a look at the current state of cryptocurrency regulation in the United States, which is a complex and confusing landscape. Multiple agencies, including the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), and the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN), have overlapping jurisdictions, creating a fragmented regulatory environment. This lack of clarity has hindered innovation, as companies are reluctant to invest in the United States, fearing regulatory repercussions. A cohesive and clear regulatory framework is urgently needed to unlock the full potential of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

While the US struggles to find its footing, other countries, such as Singapore and the UK, are actively embracing the cryptocurrency industry with clear and supportive regulatory frameworks. This has led to a brain drain, with companies opting to set up in more hospitable environments.

Vice President Kamala Harris has a unique opportunity to change this narrative and clean up the future. cryptocurrency regulation. By taking a comprehensive and inclusive approach, it can help create a framework that balances consumer protection with innovation and growth. The time has come for clear and effective regulation of cryptocurrencies in the United States.

Effective regulation of digital assets is essential to fostering a safe and innovative environment. Key principles guiding this regulation include clarity, innovation, global cooperation, consumer protection, and flexibility. Clear definitions and guidelines eliminate ambiguity, while encouraging experimentation and development to ensure progress. Collaboration with international partners establishes consistent standards, preventing regulatory arbitrage. Strong safeguards protect consumers from fraud and market abuse, and adaptability allows for evolution in response to emerging trends and technologies, striking a balance between innovation and protection.

The benefits of effective cryptocurrency regulation are many and far-reaching. By establishing clear guidelines, governments can attract investors and traditional users, spurring growth and adoption. This, in turn, can position countries like the United States as global leaders in financial technology and innovation. Strong protections will also increase consumer confidence in digital assets and related products, boosting economic activity.

A thriving cryptocurrency industry can significantly contribute to GDP and job creation, which has a positive impact on the overall economy. Furthermore, effective regulation has paved the way for the growth of many companies such as tech startups, online casinos, and pharmaceutical companies, proving that clear guidelines can unlock new opportunities without stifling innovation. This is a great example of how regulation can alleviate fears of regressive policies, even if Kamala Harris does not repeal the current progressive approach. By adopting effective regulation, governments can create fertile ground for the cryptocurrency industry to thrive, driving progress and prosperity.

Source

Regulation

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News

Published

4 months ago

1 August, 2024

Chain Feed Staff

Think You Own Your Crypto? New UK Law Would Ensure It – DL News

The UK Law Commission has developed a bill that will address a situation of legal uncertainty.
The commission’s goal is to ensure that cryptocurrencies are legally treated as personal property.

UK law is not entirely clear whether cryptocurrencies can be considered personal property.

This is according to the UK Law Commission, which argues that while most investors assume that when they buy cryptocurrencies, they are “acquiring property rights in the same way as buying, say, a watch or a laptop.”

“As the law currently stands, this is not necessarily the case,” the respected legal body said in a new report on Tuesday.

The report was accompanied by a solution: a new bill to consolidate the legal status of digital assets as personal property.

This could be huge for the estimated 4.7 million Britons valued hold cryptocurrencies.

“This will allow the courts to determine a range of issues,” the report says.

If passed, the law would help clarify how cryptocurrencies are treated in cases of bankruptcy, estate planning or theft.

Flexible law

The commission is an independent body responsible for reviewing UK law. It began investigating whether English and Welsh property laws apply to digital assets in 2020.

Join the community to receive our latest stories and updates

At the time, then-Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak expressed ambitions to transform the UK into a cryptocurrency hub as Britons invested more.

In 2023, the commission decided that, in most cases, the legislation of England and Wales is sufficiently flexible to regulate cryptocurrencies.

This means that any asset, from Bitcoin to non-fungible tokens and some types of digital contracts, can be considered personal property, without Parliament having to write extensive new laws.

There was one small area of uncertainty, however: it was unclear whether cryptocurrencies fell within the two categories of personal property recognised under UK law.

These two categories are made up of tangible assets (cars, laptops, bags) and intangible assets (contracts, stocks, and debt).

The bill that will now go to Parliament to be converted into law aims to remedy this situation.

Without that clarification, courts may try to lump cryptocurrencies together with intangible assets, said Adam Sanitt, head of litigation, knowledge, innovation and corporate support EMEA at law firm Norton Rose Fulbright. DL News in March.

This is problematic because intangible assets are creations of the legal system, while cryptocurrencies are not.

“How the law treats digital assets, what rights you have over them, how you own them, how you transfer them to other people—that treatment is different, because digital assets don’t exist by virtue of the legal system, but independently of it,” Sanitt said.

The money in your bank account, for example, is a legal creation. The government could pass a law to cancel it.

However, if the UK passed a law banning Bitcoin, Bitcoin would not cease to exist.

Sanitt said: “That’s why digital assets are so important: neither the government nor the legal system can take them away from you.”

Contact the author at joanna@dlnews.com.

Source

Regulation

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

Published

4 months ago

1 August, 2024

Chain Feed Staff

The Solution the Cryptocurrency Industry Needs

The cryptocurrency industry has performed remarkably well since its inception, but now faces a critical hurdle that requires careful consideration and regulatory expertise to overcome. Despite the industry’s rapid growth and rate of global adoption, the gap between the industry and global regulation is only widening as new innovations break through into the public domain.

Although efforts are being made on both sides, regulators’ lack of familiarity with cryptocurrencies and the industry’s lack of regulatory expertise are hindering innovation in the sector. To address this issue, traditional financial institutions (TradFi) such as MultiBank Group have started venturing into the cryptocurrency sector.

The regulatory gap

Over the past decade, the cryptocurrency industry has grown dramatically as tech entrepreneurs and forward-thinking thinkers have founded a plethora of crypto platforms and protocols to push the boundaries of the space. The problem faced by these newcomers, who are often unfamiliar with the hurdles posed by financial regulators, can quickly overwhelm and stall operations.

On the other hand, regulators more attuned to TradFi systems may be equally stifled by the complexities of decentralization and blockchain technology. The unfamiliarity experienced by both innovators and regulators creates a stark regulatory divide between both sides, leading to misunderstandings and potential conflicts.

To overcome this lack of communication, a bridge must be built to bridge the gap, ensuring future stability for the cryptocurrency industry and clearer legislation from regulators.

Efforts to bridge the gap between industry

The gap between the cryptocurrency industry and regulators is slowly narrowing as efforts to regulate cryptocurrencies and Web3 space activities are gaining momentum. Specific regulatory actions are taking place in many countries, aimed at providing greater oversight of cryptocurrency transactions, cryptocurrency exchanges, and initial coin offerings (ICOs).

Despite being a positive step in the right direction, these new regulations can differ significantly between jurisdictions around the world. This fragmentation results in a regulatory environment filled with obstacles, bottlenecks, and varying requirements and prohibitions. As cryptocurrency companies and TradFi institutions attempt to navigate the minefield, the regulatory maze becomes increasingly convoluted.

TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group are working to solve this problem, as one of the largest financial derivatives institutions in the world with over 12 licenses across all continents. Founded in 2005, the Group has an impeccable and trustworthy reputation globally, extensive expertise in financial regulation and has now ventured into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io.

MultiBank.io: TradFi Excellence in the Crypto Space

Expanding into the cryptocurrency space via MultiBank.io has enabled MultiBank Group to provide regulatory clarity and trust to the digital asset industry. With a substantial daily trading volume of $12.1 billion, the timely decision to enter the cryptocurrency space has the potential to set regulatory precedents and standards for years to come.

By helping to develop sensible and well-considered regulations, MultiBank.io’s established reputation allows the company to communicate effectively and clearly with regulators. Unlike others in the industry without regulatory expertise, MultiBank.io facilitates the Group’s commitment to rigorous regulatory standards, the scope of oversight and establishes the necessary transparency.

The company’s approach ensures that regulatory licenses are pre-acquired, compliance is met globally without jurisdictional barriers, and transactions remain secure at all times. By helping to create robust regulations that are both clear and innovation-friendly, MultiBank Group looks forward to standardizing the entire cryptocurrency industry for other potential innovators.

One of the biggest challenges in establishing a clearly constructed bridge between regulators and the cryptocurrency industry is effective communication. By leveraging its institutional background TradFi and acting as an intermediary with regulators, MultiBank Group is able to translate the needs of the industry to those who shape it.

This quality of mediation is essential to ensure that regulation helps develop essential technological advances rather than hinders their establishment and growth. Through the lens of TradFi when looking at the complexity of the cryptocurrency industry, MultiBank Group is able to deconstruct unfamiliar crypto arguments for regulation and create a safer and more secure space.

Where TradFi and Crypto Meet

Regulations are crucial for traders, investors, and everyday users of crypto platforms and their safety when participating in crypto markets. While strict regulations are necessary for stable market integrity, innovation should still be considered, something MultiBank Group considers a priority.

Where TradFi and cryptocurrencies converge, the Group is there to provide a balanced approach to ensure promotion for both the cryptocurrency industry and regulators seeking to protect both retail and institutional investors. This balance is critical to maintaining a thriving space where cryptocurrency innovation can thrive without compromising the security of user funds or data.

As more TradFi institutions like MultiBank Group enter the cryptocurrency space with ever-expanding expertise in regulatory understanding, the future of the industry is increasingly encouraged. The financial freedoms of the cryptocurrency space coupled with regulatory oversight for financial security will be the guiding lights for the future success of the entire cryptocurrency industry.

No spam, no lies, just insights. You can unsubscribe at any time.

Source